TSTP Solution File: LCL397-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LCL397-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:49:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 287.29s 287.56s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL397-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 03:50:23 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.63 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 287.29/287.56 %-------------------------------------------
% 287.29/287.56 % File :CSE---1.6
% 287.29/287.56 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 287.29/287.56 % Transform :cnf
% 287.29/287.56 % Format :tptp:raw
% 287.29/287.56 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 287.29/287.56
% 287.29/287.56 % Result :Theorem 286.530000s
% 287.29/287.56 % Output :CNFRefutation 286.530000s
% 287.29/287.56 %-------------------------------------------
% 287.34/287.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 287.34/287.65 % File : LCL397-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 287.34/287.65 % Domain : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued sentential)
% 287.34/287.65 % Problem : CN-63 depends on the Lukasiewicz system
% 287.34/287.65 % Version : [McC92] axioms.
% 287.34/287.65 % English : An axiomatisation of the Implication/Negation 2 valued
% 287.34/287.65 % sentential calculus is {CN-1,CN-2,CN-3} by Lukasiewicz.
% 287.34/287.65 % Show that CN-63 depends on the Lukasiewicz system.
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 % Refs : [Wos96] Wos (1996), Combining Resonance with Heat
% 287.34/287.65 % : [McC92] McCune (1992), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 287.34/287.65 % Source : [Wos96]
% 287.34/287.65 % Names : thesis_63 [Wos96]
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 287.34/287.65 % Rating : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.08 v5.1.0, 0.12 v5.0.0, 0.13 v4.0.1, 0.00 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.3.0
% 287.34/287.65 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% 287.34/287.65 % Number of literals : 7 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% 287.34/287.65 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 287.34/287.65 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 287.34/287.65 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 287.34/287.65 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 287.34/287.65 % Number of variables : 8 ( 1 sgn)
% 287.34/287.65 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 % Comments :
% 287.34/287.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 287.34/287.65 cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
% 287.34/287.65 ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
% 287.34/287.65 | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 287.34/287.65 | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 cnf(cn_1,axiom,
% 287.34/287.65 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 cnf(cn_2,axiom,
% 287.34/287.65 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),X),X)) ).
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 cnf(cn_3,axiom,
% 287.34/287.65 is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))) ).
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 cnf(prove_cn_63,negated_conjecture,
% 287.34/287.65 ~ is_a_theorem(implies(x,implies(y,y))) ).
% 287.34/287.65
% 287.34/287.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 287.34/287.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 287.34/287.65 % Proof found
% 287.34/287.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 287.34/287.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 287.34/287.74 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 287.34/287.74 %VarNum:16(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 287.34/287.74 %MaxLitNum:3
% 287.34/287.74 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 287.34/287.74 %SharedTerms:5
% 287.34/287.74 %goalClause: 4
% 287.34/287.74 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 287.34/287.74 [4]~P1(f2(a3,f2(a4,a4)))
% 287.34/287.74 [2]P1(f2(f2(f1(x21),x21),x21))
% 287.34/287.74 [1]P1(f2(x11,f2(f1(x11),x12)))
% 287.34/287.74 [3]P1(f2(f2(x31,x32),f2(f2(x32,x33),f2(x31,x33))))
% 287.34/287.74 [5]P1(x51)+~P1(x52)+~P1(f2(x52,x51))
% 287.34/287.74 %EqnAxiom
% 287.34/287.74
% 287.34/287.74 %-------------------------------------------
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(6,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(f2(f2(f2(f1(x61),x62),x63),f2(x61,x63)))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(17,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(f2(x171,x171))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,6,5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(24,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(f2(f1(f2(x241,x241)),x242))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[17,1,5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2844,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (~P1(f2(f2(f2(f1(x28441),x28441),x28441),f2(a3,f2(a4,a4))))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2851,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28511)+~P1(x28512)+~P1(f2(x28512,x28511))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2852,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (~P1(f2(a3,f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4))))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,4,2844,5,2851])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2863,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28631)+~P1(x28632)+~P1(f2(x28632,x28631))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2865,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28651)+~P1(x28652)+~P1(f2(x28652,x28651))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2866,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (~P1(f2(f2(f2(f1(f2(a3,f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4)))),f2(a3,f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4)))),f2(a3,f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4)))),f2(a3,f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4)))))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2852,2,5,2863,2865])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2867,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28671)+~P1(x28672)+~P1(f2(x28672,x28671))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2868,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (~P1(f2(f2(f1(a3),x28681),f2(f1(f2(a4,a4)),f2(a4,a4))))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2852,2,6,5,2863,2865,2867])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2872,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28721)+~P1(x28722)+~P1(f2(x28722,x28721))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2874,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 (P1(x28741)+~P1(x28742)+~P1(f2(x28742,x28741))),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(rename_variables,[],[5])).
% 287.54/287.83 cnf(2875,plain,
% 287.54/287.83 ($false),
% 287.54/287.83 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2866,2868,24,2,3,5,2872,2874]),
% 287.54/287.83 ['proof']).
% 287.54/287.83 % SZS output end Proof
% 287.54/287.84 % Total time :286.530000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------