TSTP Solution File: LCL396-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL396-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.95Xe35elnp true

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 16.05s 2.93s
% Output   : Refutation 16.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LCL396-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.95Xe35elnp true
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:08:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.64  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.64  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.64  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.69/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.69/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.20/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 16.05/2.93  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 16.05/2.93  % BCE start: 5
% 16.05/2.93  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 16.05/2.93  % PE start: 5
% 16.05/2.93  logic: neq
% 16.05/2.93  % PE eliminated: 0
% 16.05/2.93  % done 832 iterations in 2.197s
% 16.05/2.93  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 16.05/2.93  % SZS output start Refutation
% 16.05/2.93  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 16.05/2.93    (is_a_theorem @
% 16.05/2.93     ( implies @
% 16.05/2.93       ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 16.05/2.93       ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.05/2.93           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 16.05/2.93            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 16.05/2.93    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | 
% 16.05/2.93     ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.05/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(prove_cn_62, conjecture,
% 16.05/2.93    (is_a_theorem @
% 16.05/2.93     ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ ( not @ x ) ) @ y ) @ ( implies @ x @ y ) ))).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 16.05/2.93    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 16.05/2.93        ( implies @
% 16.05/2.93          ( implies @ ( not @ ( not @ x ) ) @ y ) @ ( implies @ x @ y ) ) )),
% 16.05/2.93    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_62])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.05/2.93          (implies @ (implies @ (not @ (not @ x)) @ y) @ (implies @ x @ y)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ x @ (not @ (not @ x))))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(cn_2, axiom,
% 16.05/2.93    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ X ) @ X ))).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X0) @ X0))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_2])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(cn_3, axiom,
% 16.05/2.93    (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ))).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.05/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.05/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ X3)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl41, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X3) @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl224, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl41])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.05/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.05/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.05/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.05/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 16.05/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.05/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl254, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0) |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl224, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ X3)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl275, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl254, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl5864, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ X1)
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl275])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93           (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 16.40/2.93            (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93             (implies @ 
% 16.40/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl5951, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5864, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_3])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ X3)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X3) @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93             (implies @ 
% 16.40/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl132, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93             (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X2 @ X1)) @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ (not @ X3)) @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl15])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6112, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ X2) @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93              (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 16.40/2.93                [zip_derived_cl5951, zip_derived_cl132])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6169, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6112])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6169, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6112])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6239, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6169, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6261, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6239, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6947, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 16.40/2.93                [zip_derived_cl6169, zip_derived_cl6261])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl7235, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X1) @ X2)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6947, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl7748, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ (not @ X0)) @ X0))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl7235])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6169, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 16.40/2.93           (implies @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6112])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.40/2.93          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl6213, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.40/2.93         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1)))
% 16.40/2.93          |  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6169, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl7838, plain,
% 16.40/2.93      (![X0 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ (not @ X0))))),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 16.40/2.93                [zip_derived_cl7748, zip_derived_cl6213])).
% 16.40/2.93  thf(zip_derived_cl7913, plain, ($false),
% 16.40/2.93      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl12, zip_derived_cl7838])).
% 16.40/2.93  
% 16.40/2.93  % SZS output end Refutation
% 16.40/2.93  
% 16.40/2.93  
% 16.40/2.93  % Terminating...
% 16.49/2.98  % Runner terminated.
% 16.49/2.99  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------