TSTP Solution File: LCL390-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL390-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:29:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 23.64s 23.91s
% Output : Refutation 23.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14 % Problem : LCL390-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.14/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 04:15:56 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.38 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.38 Mon Jul 4 04:15:56 2022
% 0.14/0.38 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 27469.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.38 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.38 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.38 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.38 in usable.
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.38 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.41 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.41 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.14/0.41 number of clauses initially in problem: 5
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.14/0.41 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.41 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.41 absolute distinct symbol count: 5
% 0.14/0.41 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.14/0.41 distinct function count: 2
% 0.14/0.41 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 =========== start of search ===========
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Changing weight limit from 60 to 52.
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 5 [ 1 0 109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 6 [ 1 0 74 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Model 7 [ 1 1 29 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.21/11.42
% 11.21/11.42 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 165 givens.
% 11.21/11.42
% 12.52/12.75
% 12.52/12.75
% 12.52/12.75 Changing weight limit from 52 to 29.
% 12.52/12.75
% 12.52/12.75 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 295 givens.
% 12.52/12.75
% 12.60/12.78
% 12.60/12.78
% 12.60/12.78 Changing weight limit from 29 to 27.
% 12.60/12.78
% 12.60/12.78 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 300 givens.
% 12.60/12.78
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.53/15.71 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.53/15.71 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.53/15.71 Model 8 [ 1 0 46 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.53/15.71 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 345 givens.
% 15.53/15.71
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74 Changing weight limit from 26 to 23.
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.74 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 350 givens.
% 15.56/15.74
% 15.56/15.76
% 15.56/15.76
% 15.56/15.76 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 15.56/15.76
% 15.56/15.76 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 355 givens.
% 15.56/15.76
% 15.56/15.78
% 15.56/15.78
% 15.56/15.78 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 15.56/15.78
% 15.56/15.78 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 360 givens.
% 15.56/15.78
% 15.56/15.80
% 15.56/15.80
% 15.56/15.80 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 15.56/15.80
% 15.56/15.80 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 365 givens.
% 15.56/15.80
% 15.66/15.87
% 15.66/15.87
% 15.66/15.87 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 15.66/15.87
% 15.66/15.87 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 385 givens.
% 15.66/15.87
% 15.74/15.92
% 15.74/15.92
% 15.74/15.92 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 15.74/15.92
% 15.74/15.92 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 395 givens.
% 15.74/15.92
% 15.81/16.02
% 15.81/16.02
% 15.81/16.02 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 15.81/16.02
% 15.81/16.02 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 430 givens.
% 15.81/16.02
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.04/16.27 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.04/16.27 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.04/16.27 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 500 givens.
% 16.04/16.27
% 16.91/17.10
% 16.91/17.10
% 16.91/17.10 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 16.91/17.10
% 16.91/17.10 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 745 givens.
% 16.91/17.10
% 20.77/20.99
% 20.77/20.99
% 20.77/20.99 Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 20.77/20.99
% 20.77/20.99 Resetting weight limit to 14 after 1920 givens.
% 20.77/20.99
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 22.69 sec ----> 52117 [binary,52116.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 Length of proof is 33. Level of proof is 20.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 23.64/23.91 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 23.64/23.91 % SZS output start Refutation
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 23.64/23.91 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(implies(x,y),y))).
% 23.64/23.91 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 23.64/23.91 4 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).
% 23.64/23.91 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 23.64/23.91 6 [hyper,3,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 23.64/23.91 7 [hyper,4,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))).
% 23.64/23.91 9 [hyper,5,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))).
% 23.64/23.91 15 [hyper,9,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 23.64/23.91 18 [hyper,6,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))).
% 23.64/23.91 21 [hyper,6,1,9] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 23.64/23.91 24 [hyper,21,1,9] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(not(A),C)))).
% 23.64/23.91 26 [hyper,21,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),D),implies(implies(B,not(A)),D))).
% 23.64/23.91 55 [hyper,24,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),C)),D),implies(B,D))).
% 23.64/23.91 71 [hyper,55,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(D,C)))).
% 23.64/23.91 85 [hyper,71,1,15] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))).
% 23.64/23.91 111 [hyper,85,1,4] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))).
% 23.64/23.91 162 [hyper,111,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,A),B),implies(C,B))).
% 23.64/23.91 203 [hyper,162,1,7] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))).
% 23.64/23.91 437 [hyper,203,1,18] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))).
% 23.64/23.91 931 [hyper,437,1,437] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(not(C),C)),implies(B,C)))).
% 23.64/23.91 937 [hyper,437,1,55] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,A)))).
% 23.64/23.91 939 [hyper,437,1,26] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(C,implies(B,A)))).
% 23.64/23.91 971 [hyper,939,1,437] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),not(C)),implies(C,B)))).
% 23.64/23.91 991 [hyper,937,1,437] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,implies(C,B)))).
% 23.64/23.91 1097 [hyper,991,1,991] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 23.64/23.91 1124 [hyper,971,1,971] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 23.64/23.91 1213 [hyper,1097,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(B,C))).
% 23.64/23.91 1474 [hyper,931,1,931] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 23.64/23.91 1505 [hyper,1474,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))).
% 23.64/23.91 1589 [hyper,1505,1,3] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),B),C),implies(implies(not(B),A),C))).
% 23.64/23.91 1892 [hyper,1213,1,1505] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 23.64/23.91 1894 [hyper,1213,1,1124] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(not(A),implies(A,B))).
% 23.64/23.91 2427 [hyper,1894,1,1505] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A)).
% 23.64/23.91 2537 [hyper,1892,1,2427] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A),C),C)).
% 23.64/23.91 7114 [hyper,2537,1,6] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(implies(B,C),B)),implies(A,B))).
% 23.64/23.91 11315 [hyper,7114,1,6] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),C),implies(implies(C,A),A))).
% 23.64/23.91 52116 [hyper,11315,1,1589] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 23.64/23.91 52117 [binary,52116.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 % SZS output end Refutation
% 23.64/23.91 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 ============ end of search ============
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 true clauses given 920 (33.7%)
% 23.64/23.91 false clauses given 1809
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 FALSE TRUE
% 23.64/23.91 12 0 404
% 23.64/23.91 13 0 1271
% 23.64/23.91 14 2092 834
% 23.64/23.91 tot: 2092 2509 (54.5% true)
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 Model 8 [ 1 0 46 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 23.64/23.91
% 23.64/23.91 Process 27469 finished Mon Jul 4 04:16:20 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------