TSTP Solution File: LCL366-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL366-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:04:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.74s 1.97s
% Output   : Refutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (   0 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (  13 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL366-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(implies(y,x),x))),
    file('LCL366-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    file('LCL366-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)),
    file('LCL366-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))),
    file('LCL366-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[3,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,3,1,3')] ).

cnf(7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(not(A),A),B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[4,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,4,1,3')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1,3')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1,6')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D)),implies(implies(C,A),D))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1,6')] ).

cnf(35,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,6')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,1,4')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[40,1,5]),
    [iquote('hyper,40,1,5')] ).

cnf(72,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(implies(B,B)),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[35,1,42]),
    [iquote('hyper,35,1,42')] ).

cnf(99,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[72,1,3]),
    [iquote('hyper,72,1,3')] ).

cnf(370,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[99,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,99,1,4')] ).

cnf(412,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,implies(A,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[370,1,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,370,1,16')] ).

cnf(456,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[412,1,4]),
    [iquote('hyper,412,1,4')] ).

cnf(538,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(not(B),B)),implies(C,implies(A,B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[456,1,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,456,1,16')] ).

cnf(1308,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(not(C),C)),implies(B,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[538,1,538]),
    [iquote('hyper,538,1,538')] ).

cnf(2422,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),B),implies(implies(B,A),A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[1308,1,27]),
    [iquote('hyper,1308,1,27')] ).

cnf(2423,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[2422,2]),
    [iquote('binary,2422.1,2.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : LCL366-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:16:36 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.74/1.97  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.74/1.97  The process was started by sandbox on n009.cluster.edu,
% 1.74/1.97  Wed Jul 27 09:16:36 2022
% 1.74/1.97  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 22771.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.74/1.97  set(auto).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.74/1.97  clear(print_given).
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  list(usable).
% 1.74/1.97  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))| -is_a_theorem(X)|is_a_theorem(Y).
% 1.74/1.97  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))).
% 1.74/1.97  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),X),X)).
% 1.74/1.97  0 [] is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))).
% 1.74/1.97  0 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(implies(y,x),x))).
% 1.74/1.97  end_of_list.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.74/1.97  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 1.74/1.97  in usable.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.74/1.97     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ------------> process usable:
% 1.74/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 1.74/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 2 [] -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(x),y),implies(implies(y,x),x))).
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ------------> process sos:
% 1.74/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 3 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 1.74/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 4 [] is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)).
% 1.74/1.97  ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 5 [] is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))).
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Resetting weight limit to 14.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Resetting weight limit to 14.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  sos_size=2074
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.15 sec ----> 2423 [binary,2422.1,2.1] $F.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Length of proof is 16.  Level of proof is 11.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.74/1.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.74/1.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.74/1.97  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ============ end of search ============
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.74/1.97  clauses given                198
% 1.74/1.97  clauses generated          21947
% 1.74/1.97  clauses kept                2422
% 1.74/1.97  clauses forward subsumed   15081
% 1.74/1.97  clauses back subsumed         75
% 1.74/1.97  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.74/1.97  user CPU time          0.15          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.74/1.97  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.74/1.97  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.74/1.97  
% 1.74/1.97  Process 22771 finished Wed Jul 27 09:16:37 2022
% 1.74/1.97  Otter interrupted
% 1.74/1.97  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------