TSTP Solution File: LCL362-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL362-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:48:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  27   ~;  20   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   4 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f305,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f92,f285,f302,f304]) ).

fof(f304,plain,
    ~ spl5_30,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f303]) ).

fof(f303,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl5_30 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f284,f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(sF4),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f5,f10,f8,f7,f6,f9,f8,f7,f6]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    sF3 = implies(x,sF2),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    not(y) = sF0,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    sF1 = implies(sF0,y),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    implies(sF1,y) = sF2,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    sF4 = implies(sF3,sF2),
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(not(y),y),y)),implies(implies(not(y),y),y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_11) ).

fof(f284,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(sF4)
    | ~ spl5_30 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f282]) ).

fof(f282,plain,
    ( spl5_30
  <=> is_a_theorem(sF4) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_30])]) ).

fof(f302,plain,
    ( ~ spl5_5
    | ~ spl5_29 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f301,f279,f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( spl5_5
  <=> is_a_theorem(sF2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_5])]) ).

fof(f279,plain,
    ( spl5_29
  <=> ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF3,X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,sF2)) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl5_29])]) ).

fof(f301,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(sF2)
    | ~ spl5_29 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f298,f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(not(X1),X2))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f1,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X0),X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_3) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f298,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(sF2),x))
    | ~ spl5_29 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f288,f3]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),X0),X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_2) ).

fof(f288,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,sF2),sF2))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,x)) )
    | ~ spl5_29 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f280,f163]) ).

fof(f163,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(sF3,implies(X0,sF2)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,x)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f76,f1]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X2,x),implies(sF3,implies(X2,sF2)))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f2,f9]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_1) ).

fof(f280,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF3,X0))
        | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,sF2)) )
    | ~ spl5_29 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f279]) ).

fof(f285,plain,
    ( spl5_29
    | spl5_30 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f275,f282,f279]) ).

fof(f275,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(sF4)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF3,X0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,sF2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f217,f1]) ).

fof(f217,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,sF2),sF4))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF3,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f81,f1]) ).

fof(f81,plain,
    ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF3,X3),implies(implies(X3,sF2),sF4))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f2,f10]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    spl5_5,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f91]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl5_5 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f46,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    is_a_theorem(sF2),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f13,f8]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(sF1,y)),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f12,f7]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,y),y)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f3,f6]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(sF2)
    | spl5_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f44]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : LCL362-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 02:20:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.44  % (2349)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (2364)ott+10_1:1_tgt=ground:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.46  % (2349)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.47  % (2372)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2357)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Time elapsed: 0.098 s
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2349)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2345)Success in time 0.139 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------