TSTP Solution File: LCL362-1 by Prover9---1109a
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Prover9---1109a
% Problem : LCL362-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:46:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 0.92s
% Output : Refutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LCL362-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 17:43:46 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.40/0.92 Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.40/0.92 Process 16523 was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.40/0.92 Mon Jul 4 17:43:46 2022
% 0.40/0.92 The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_16369_n012.cluster.edu".
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_16369_n012.cluster.edu
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.40/0.92 set(auto2).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.40/0.92 % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.40/0.92 % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.40/0.92 % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.40/0.92 assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.40/0.92 assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.40/0.92 assign(order,kbo).
% 0.40/0.92 set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.40/0.92 clear(print_given).
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % formulas(sos). % not echoed (5 formulas)
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 Auto_denials:
% 0.40/0.92 % copying label prove_cn_11 to answer in negative clause
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 Term ordering decisions:
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % Assigning unary symbol not kb_weight 0 and highest precedence (5).
% 0.40/0.92 Function symbol KB weights: x=1. y=1. implies=1. not=0.
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.40/0.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.92 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % Proof 1 at 0.04 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_cn_11.
% 0.40/0.92 % Length of proof is 17.
% 0.40/0.92 % Level of proof is 9.
% 0.40/0.92 % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.40/0.92 % Given clauses 48.
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 1 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(A),A),A)) # label(cn_2) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.92 2 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(A),B))) # label(cn_3) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.92 3 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))) # label(cn_1) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.92 4 -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(x,implies(implies(not(y),y),y)),implies(implies(not(y),y),y))) # label(prove_cn_11) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_cn_11). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.92 5 -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(B) # label(condensed_detachment) # label(axiom). [assumption].
% 0.40/0.92 6 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))). [hyper(5,a,3,a,b,3,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 7 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(A),B),C),implies(A,C))). [hyper(5,a,3,a,b,2,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 12 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))). [hyper(5,a,6,a,b,6,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 21 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,implies(A,C)))). [hyper(5,a,6,a,b,7,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 26 is_a_theorem(implies(A,A)). [hyper(5,a,7,a,b,1,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 27 is_a_theorem(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B)). [hyper(5,a,2,a,b,26,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 72 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(not(implies(B,B)),C))). [hyper(5,a,21,a,b,27,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 95 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(not(implies(A,A)),B),C),implies(D,C))). [hyper(5,a,3,a,b,72,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 460 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,B))). [hyper(5,a,95,a,b,1,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 469 is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,implies(A,B)))). [hyper(5,a,12,a,b,460,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 550 is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(not(B),B),B))). [hyper(5,a,469,a,b,1,a)].
% 0.40/0.92 551 $F # answer(prove_cn_11). [resolve(550,a,4,a)].
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 Given=48. Generated=1167. Kept=550. proofs=1.
% 0.40/0.92 Usable=48. Sos=442. Demods=0. Limbo=42, Disabled=22. Hints=0.
% 0.40/0.92 Megabytes=0.72.
% 0.40/0.92 User_CPU=0.04, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 THEOREM PROVED
% 0.40/0.92 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.40/0.92
% 0.40/0.92 Process 16523 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul 4 17:43:46 2022
% 0.40/0.92 Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------