TSTP Solution File: LCL361-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : LCL361-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:58 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.60s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 10 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 4 ( 3 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 (; 31 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ is_a_theorem > implies > #nlpp > not > y > x
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(x,type,
x: $i ).
tff(is_a_theorem,type,
is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).
tff(y,type,
y: $i ).
tff(not,type,
not: $i > $i ).
tff(implies,type,
implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(f_38,axiom,
! [X,Y] : is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(not(X),Y))),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_34,axiom,
! [X,Y,Z] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,Y),implies(implies(Y,Z),implies(X,Z)))),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_32,axiom,
! [X,Y] :
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X)
| is_a_theorem(Y) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_40,axiom,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(x,implies(implies(implies(not(x),x),x),implies(implies(y,x),x)))),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [X_7,Y_8] : is_a_theorem(implies(X_7,implies(not(X_7),Y_8))),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [X_3,Y_4,Z_5] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_3,Y_4),implies(implies(Y_4,Z_5),implies(X_3,Z_5)))),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_33,plain,
! [X_17,Y_18,Z_19] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X_17,Y_18),implies(implies(Y_18,Z_19),implies(X_17,Z_19)))),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [Y_2,X_1] :
( is_a_theorem(Y_2)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X_1)
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_1,Y_2)) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).
tff(c_40,plain,
! [Y_21,Z_22,X_23] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(Y_21,Z_22),implies(X_23,Z_22)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_23,Y_21)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_33,c_2]) ).
tff(c_45,plain,
! [X_24,Z_25,Y_26] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X_24,Z_25))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(Y_26,Z_25))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_24,Y_26)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_2]) ).
tff(c_57,plain,
! [X_24,Y_4,Z_5,X_3] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X_24,implies(implies(Y_4,Z_5),implies(X_3,Z_5))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_24,implies(X_3,Y_4))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_45]) ).
tff(c_127,plain,
! [X_36,Y_37,Z_38,X_39] :
( is_a_theorem(implies(X_36,implies(implies(Y_37,Z_38),implies(X_39,Z_38))))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X_36,implies(X_39,Y_37))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_45]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(x,implies(implies(implies(not(x),x),x),implies(implies(y,x),x)))),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).
tff(c_141,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(x,implies(implies(y,x),implies(not(x),x)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_127,c_10]) ).
tff(c_163,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(x,implies(not(x),y))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_141]) ).
tff(c_167,plain,
$false,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_163]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL361-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 13:56:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 2.60/1.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.60/1.58
% 2.60/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.69/1.62
% 2.69/1.62 Inference rules
% 2.69/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.69/1.62 #Ref : 0
% 2.69/1.62 #Sup : 34
% 2.69/1.62 #Fact : 0
% 2.69/1.62 #Define : 0
% 2.69/1.62 #Split : 1
% 2.69/1.62 #Chain : 0
% 2.69/1.62 #Close : 0
% 2.69/1.62
% 2.69/1.62 Ordering : KBO
% 2.69/1.62
% 2.69/1.62 Simplification rules
% 2.69/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.69/1.62 #Subsume : 5
% 2.69/1.62 #Demod : 2
% 2.69/1.62 #Tautology : 5
% 2.69/1.62 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 2.69/1.62 #BackRed : 0
% 2.69/1.62
% 2.69/1.62 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 2.69/1.62 #Strategies tried : 1
% 2.69/1.62
% 2.69/1.62 Timing (in seconds)
% 2.69/1.62 ----------------------
% 2.69/1.62 Preprocessing : 0.40
% 2.69/1.62 Parsing : 0.22
% 2.69/1.62 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 2.69/1.62 Main loop : 0.28
% 2.69/1.62 Inferencing : 0.12
% 2.69/1.62 Reduction : 0.07
% 2.69/1.62 Demodulation : 0.05
% 2.69/1.62 BG Simplification : 0.01
% 2.69/1.62 Subsumption : 0.06
% 2.69/1.62 Abstraction : 0.01
% 2.69/1.62 MUC search : 0.00
% 2.69/1.62 Cooper : 0.00
% 2.69/1.62 Total : 0.74
% 2.69/1.62 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 2.69/1.62 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 2.69/1.62 Index Matching : 0.00
% 2.69/1.62 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------