TSTP Solution File: LCL358-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL358-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RiMADE8Zo1 true
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:24 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.29s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL358-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RiMADE8Zo1 true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 02:19:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.14/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.14/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.29/0.79 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.29/0.79 % BCE start: 5
% 1.29/0.79 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.29/0.79 % PE start: 5
% 1.29/0.79 logic: neq
% 1.29/0.79 % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.29/0.79 % done 30 iterations in 0.031s
% 1.29/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.29/0.79 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.29/0.79 thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(v_type, type, v: $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(z_type, type, z: $i).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(cn_1, axiom,
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ X @ Y ) @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 1.29/0.79 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 1.29/0.79 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.29/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.29/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.29/0.79 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl21, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X3 @ X0)))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X3) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(prove_cn_07, conjecture,
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ x @ ( implies @ ( implies @ y @ z ) @ u ) ) @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ y @ v ) @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ x @ ( implies @ ( implies @ v @ z ) @ u ) ) ) ))).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.29/0.79 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ x @ ( implies @ ( implies @ y @ z ) @ u ) ) @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ y @ v ) @
% 1.29/0.79 ( implies @ x @ ( implies @ ( implies @ v @ z ) @ u ) ) ) ) )),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_cn_07])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ x @ (implies @ (implies @ y @ z) @ u)) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ y @ v) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ x @ (implies @ (implies @ v @ z) @ u)))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl92, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ y @ v) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ y @ z) @ u) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ v @ z) @ u))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl21, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [cn_1])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)) @ X3))
% 1.29/0.79 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 1.29/0.79 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.29/0.79 (is_a_theorem @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ X2) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X3 @ X1) @ X0) @
% 1.29/0.79 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 1.29/0.79 thf(zip_derived_cl93, plain, ($false),
% 1.29/0.79 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl92, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 1.29/0.79
% 1.29/0.79 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.29/0.79
% 1.29/0.79
% 1.29/0.79 % Terminating...
% 1.41/0.87 % Runner terminated.
% 1.41/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------