TSTP Solution File: LCL355-1 by Faust---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Faust---1.0
% Problem  : LCL355-1 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : faust %s

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 1003MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed May  6 13:48:18 EDT 2009

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.2s
% Output   : Refutation 0.2s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   7   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Faust---1.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
fof(cn_1,plain,
    ! [A,B,C] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(143547064,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[cn_1]),
    [] ).

fof(prove_cn_04,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(z,y)),u),implies(implies(z,x),u))),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(143563208,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(z,y)),u),implies(implies(z,x),u))),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_04]),
    [] ).

fof(condensed_detachment,plain,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
      | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(143542144,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | is_a_theorem(B) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]),
    [] ).

cnf(151512432,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[143542144,143547064]),
    [] ).

cnf(contradiction,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__resolution,[status(thm)],[143547064,143563208,151512432]),
    [] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Proof found in: 0 seconds
% START OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% fof(cn_1,plain,(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(143547064,plain,(is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C))))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[cn_1]),[]).
% 
% fof(prove_cn_04,plain,(~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(z,y)),u),implies(implies(z,x),u)))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(143563208,plain,(~is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(x,y),implies(z,y)),u),implies(implies(z,x),u)))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_04]),[]).
% 
% fof(condensed_detachment,plain,(~is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))|~is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B)),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL355-1.tptp',unknown),[]).
% 
% cnf(143542144,plain,(~is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))|~is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]),[]).
% 
% cnf(151512432,plain,(~is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))|is_a_theorem(implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[143542144,143547064]),[]).
% 
% cnf(contradiction,plain,$false,inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__resolution,[status(thm)],[143547064,143563208,151512432]),[]).
% 
% END OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------