TSTP Solution File: LCL321-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL321-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.58s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.99s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  18 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  19   ~;  14   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   5   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (;  47   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ theorem > axiom > or > implies > #nlpp > not > q > p

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(theorem,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(q,type,
    q: $i ).

tff(axiom,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i ).

tff(implies,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_56,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( implies(X,Y) = or(not(X),Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_48,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_50,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_69,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ theorem(implies(Y,X))
      | ~ theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_52,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_77,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),implies(p,not(q)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [X_21,Y_22] : ( or(not(X_21),Y_22) = implies(X_21,Y_22) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_2,B_3] : axiom(implies(A_2,or(B_3,A_2))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [Y_22,X_21] : axiom(implies(Y_22,implies(X_21,Y_22))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_22,c_4]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_12,Y_13] : ( or(not(X_12),Y_13) = implies(X_12,Y_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_56]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_14] :
      ( ~ axiom(X_14)
      | theorem(X_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : axiom(implies(or(A_4,B_5),or(B_5,A_4))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_50]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    ! [Y_25,X_26] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_25)
      | ~ theorem(implies(Y_25,X_26))
      | theorem(X_26) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_69]) ).

tff(c_52,plain,
    ! [Y_30,X_31] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_30)
      | theorem(X_31)
      | ~ axiom(implies(Y_30,X_31)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_39]) ).

tff(c_167,plain,
    ! [A_45,B_46] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(A_45,B_46))
      | theorem(or(B_46,A_45)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_52]) ).

tff(c_176,plain,
    ! [B_46,A_45] :
      ( theorem(or(B_46,A_45))
      | ~ axiom(or(A_45,B_46)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_167]) ).

tff(c_70,plain,
    ! [Y_22,X_21] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_22)
      | theorem(implies(X_21,Y_22)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_52]) ).

tff(c_102,plain,
    ! [A_36,B_37,C_38] : axiom(implies(or(A_36,or(B_37,C_38)),or(B_37,or(A_36,C_38)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_52]) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    ! [X_12,B_37,C_38] : axiom(implies(implies(X_12,or(B_37,C_38)),or(B_37,or(not(X_12),C_38)))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_102]) ).

tff(c_409,plain,
    ! [X_83,B_84,C_85] : axiom(implies(implies(X_83,or(B_84,C_85)),or(B_84,implies(X_83,C_85)))),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_112]) ).

tff(c_43,plain,
    ! [Y_25,X_26] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_25)
      | theorem(X_26)
      | ~ axiom(implies(Y_25,X_26)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_39]) ).

tff(c_704,plain,
    ! [X_123,B_124,C_125] :
      ( ~ theorem(implies(X_123,or(B_124,C_125)))
      | theorem(or(B_124,implies(X_123,C_125))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_409,c_43]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),implies(p,not(q)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_77]) ).

tff(c_729,plain,
    ~ theorem(implies(p,or(implies(p,q),not(q)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_18]) ).

tff(c_749,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(implies(p,q),not(q))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_729]) ).

tff(c_759,plain,
    ~ axiom(or(not(q),implies(p,q))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_176,c_749]) ).

tff(c_774,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_32,c_12,c_759]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13  % Problem  : LCL321-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:12:07 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.58/1.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.58/1.98  
% 3.58/1.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.99/2.00  
% 3.99/2.00  Inference rules
% 3.99/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.00  #Ref     : 0
% 3.99/2.00  #Sup     : 171
% 3.99/2.00  #Fact    : 0
% 3.99/2.00  #Define  : 0
% 3.99/2.00  #Split   : 1
% 3.99/2.00  #Chain   : 0
% 3.99/2.00  #Close   : 0
% 3.99/2.00  
% 3.99/2.00  Ordering : KBO
% 3.99/2.00  
% 3.99/2.00  Simplification rules
% 3.99/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.00  #Subsume      : 55
% 3.99/2.00  #Demod        : 27
% 3.99/2.00  #Tautology    : 14
% 3.99/2.00  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.99/2.00  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.99/2.00  
% 3.99/2.00  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.99/2.00  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.99/2.00  
% 3.99/2.00  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.99/2.00  ----------------------
% 3.99/2.01  Preprocessing        : 0.41
% 3.99/2.01  Parsing              : 0.22
% 3.99/2.01  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.99/2.01  Main loop            : 0.51
% 3.99/2.01  Inferencing          : 0.22
% 3.99/2.01  Reduction            : 0.13
% 3.99/2.01  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 3.99/2.01  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.99/2.01  Subsumption          : 0.11
% 3.99/2.01  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.99/2.01  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.99/2.01  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.99/2.01  Total                : 0.97
% 3.99/2.01  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.99/2.01  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.99/2.01  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.99/2.01  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------