TSTP Solution File: LCL296-3 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LCL296-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:48:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL296-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 17:18:07 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.65 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.65 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.65 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.65 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % File : LCL296-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.19/0.65 % Domain : Logic Calculi (Propositional)
% 0.19/0.65 % Problem : Principia Mathematica 4.62
% 0.19/0.65 % Version : [WR27] axioms.
% 0.19/0.65 % English :
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Refs : [WR27] Whitehead & Russell (1927), Principia Mathematica
% 0.19/0.65 % Source : [WR27]
% 0.19/0.65 % Names : Problem 4.62 [WR27]
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.65 % Rating : 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.22 v5.5.0, 0.31 v5.4.0, 0.33 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.29 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.6.0, 0.29 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.3.0
% 0.19/0.65 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of literals : 14 ( 3 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.19/0.65 % Number of variables : 20 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.19/0.65 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %----Include axioms of propositional logic
% 0.19/0.65 include('Axioms/LCL004-0.ax').
% 0.19/0.65 include('Axioms/LCL004-1.ax').
% 0.19/0.65 include('Axioms/LCL004-2.ax').
% 0.19/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.65 ~ theorem(equivalent(implies(p,not(q)),or(not(p),not(q)))) ).
% 0.19/0.65
% 0.19/0.65 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.65 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.66 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.66 %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.19/0.66 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.19/0.66 %MaxfuncDepth:6
% 0.19/0.66 %SharedTerms:11
% 0.19/0.66 %goalClause: 6
% 0.19/0.66 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.19/0.66 [6]~P2(f1(f2(f1(f2(f1(f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))),f2(f1(a3),f1(a4)))),f1(f2(f1(f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))),f2(f1(a3),f1(a4)))))))
% 0.19/0.66 [2]P1(f2(f1(f2(x21,x21)),x21))
% 0.19/0.66 [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),f2(x12,x11)))
% 0.19/0.66 [3]P1(f2(f1(f2(x31,x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 0.19/0.66 [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,f2(x42,x43))),f2(x42,f2(x41,x43))))
% 0.19/0.66 [5]P1(f2(f1(f2(f1(x51),x52)),f2(f1(f2(x53,x51)),f2(x53,x52))))
% 0.19/0.66 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)
% 0.19/0.66 [8]P2(x81)+~P2(x82)+~P2(f2(f1(x82),x81))
% 0.19/0.66 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.66
% 0.19/0.66 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (P2(f2(f1(x101),f2(x102,x101)))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (P2(f2(f1(f2(x131,x131)),x131))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(22,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (P2(f2(x221,f1(f2(x221,x221))))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,3,7,8])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(30,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(x301),x302)),f2(f1(f2(x303,x301)),f2(x303,x302))))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(37,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (~P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))),f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[22,6,8])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 (~P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(x401),f2(x402,x401))),f2(f1(f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))),f2(f1(a3),f1(a4)))))),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[10,37,8])).
% 0.19/0.66 cnf(56,plain,
% 0.19/0.66 ($false),
% 0.19/0.66 inference(scs_inference,[],[30,40,13,8]),
% 0.19/0.66 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.66 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.66 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------