TSTP Solution File: LCL265-3 by LEO-II---1.7.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : LEO-II---1.7.0
% Problem : LCL265-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:22:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.12s 4.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 77 ( 60 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 227 ( 81 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 447 ( 27 ~; 26 |; 0 &; 394 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 11 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 116 ( 0 ^ 116 !; 0 ?; 116 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(tp_and,type,
and: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tp_axiom,type,
axiom: $i > $o ).
thf(tp_equivalent,type,
equivalent: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tp_implies,type,
implies: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tp_not,type,
not: $i > $i ).
thf(tp_or,type,
or: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tp_p,type,
p: $i ).
thf(tp_theorem,type,
theorem: $i > $o ).
thf(1,axiom,
! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( equivalent @ P @ Q )
= ( and @ ( implies @ P @ Q ) @ ( implies @ Q @ P ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equivalent_defn) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( and @ P @ Q )
= ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ P ) @ ( not @ Q ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_defn) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ Y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [X: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ~ ( axiom @ X ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( implies @ X @ Y )
= ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ C @ A ) @ ( or @ C @ B ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_6) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ A @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ A ) @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_2) ).
thf(11,conjecture,
$false,
file('no conjecture given, we try to refute the axioms',dummy_conjecture) ).
thf(12,negated_conjecture,
$false = $false,
inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[11]) ).
thf(13,negated_conjecture,
~ ( theorem @ ( equivalent @ p @ ( not @ ( not @ p ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
thf(14,plain,
$false = $false,
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ( ! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( equivalent @ P @ Q )
= ( and @ ( implies @ P @ Q ) @ ( implies @ Q @ P ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ( ! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( and @ P @ Q )
= ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ P ) @ ( not @ Q ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(17,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ Y ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(18,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ~ ( axiom @ X ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(19,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( implies @ X @ Y )
= ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(20,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ C @ A ) @ ( or @ C @ B ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(21,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(22,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(23,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ A @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(24,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ A ) @ A ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(25,plain,
( ( ~ ( theorem @ ( equivalent @ p @ ( not @ ( not @ p ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(unfold_def,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(26,plain,
( ( ~ $false )
= $true ),
inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(27,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ! [Y: $i] :
( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ Y ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_combined,[status(esa)],[17]) ).
thf(28,plain,
( ( ~ ( theorem @ ( equivalent @ p @ ( not @ ( not @ p ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(29,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ A ) @ A ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(30,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ A @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(31,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(32,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(33,plain,
( ( ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ C @ A ) @ ( or @ C @ B ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(34,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( implies @ X @ Y )
= ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(35,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ~ ( axiom @ X ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(36,plain,
( ( ! [X: $i] :
( ( theorem @ X )
| ! [Y: $i] :
( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ Y ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(37,plain,
( ( ! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( and @ P @ Q )
= ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ P ) @ ( not @ Q ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(38,plain,
( ( ! [P: $i,Q: $i] :
( ( equivalent @ P @ Q )
= ( and @ ( implies @ P @ Q ) @ ( implies @ Q @ P ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(39,plain,
( ( ~ $false )
= $true ),
inference(copy,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(40,plain,
( ( theorem @ ( equivalent @ p @ ( not @ ( not @ p ) ) ) )
= $false ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(41,plain,
! [SV1: $i] :
( ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV1 @ SV1 ) @ SV1 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [SV2: $i] :
( ( ! [SY20: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ SV2 @ ( or @ SY20 @ SV2 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
thf(43,plain,
! [SV3: $i] :
( ( ! [SY21: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV3 @ SY21 ) @ ( or @ SY21 @ SV3 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
thf(44,plain,
! [SV4: $i] :
( ( ! [SY22: $i,SY23: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV4 @ ( or @ SY22 @ SY23 ) ) @ ( or @ SY22 @ ( or @ SV4 @ SY23 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(45,plain,
! [SV5: $i] :
( ( ! [SY24: $i,SY25: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SV5 @ SY24 ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ SY25 @ SV5 ) @ ( or @ SY25 @ SY24 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(46,plain,
! [SV6: $i] :
( ( ! [SY26: $i] :
( ( implies @ SV6 @ SY26 )
= ( or @ ( not @ SV6 ) @ SY26 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
thf(47,plain,
! [SV7: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ SV7 )
| ~ ( axiom @ SV7 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[35]) ).
thf(48,plain,
! [SV8: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
| ! [SY27: $i] :
( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ SY27 @ SV8 ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ SY27 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[36]) ).
thf(49,plain,
! [SV9: $i] :
( ( ! [SY28: $i] :
( ( and @ SV9 @ SY28 )
= ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ SV9 ) @ ( not @ SY28 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
thf(50,plain,
! [SV10: $i] :
( ( ! [SY29: $i] :
( ( equivalent @ SV10 @ SY29 )
= ( and @ ( implies @ SV10 @ SY29 ) @ ( implies @ SY29 @ SV10 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[38]) ).
thf(51,plain,
$false = $false,
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[39]) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [SV11: $i,SV2: $i] :
( ( axiom @ ( implies @ SV2 @ ( or @ SV11 @ SV2 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[42]) ).
thf(53,plain,
! [SV12: $i,SV3: $i] :
( ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV3 @ SV12 ) @ ( or @ SV12 @ SV3 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[43]) ).
thf(54,plain,
! [SV13: $i,SV4: $i] :
( ( ! [SY30: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV4 @ ( or @ SV13 @ SY30 ) ) @ ( or @ SV13 @ ( or @ SV4 @ SY30 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [SV14: $i,SV5: $i] :
( ( ! [SY31: $i] : ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SV5 @ SV14 ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ SY31 @ SV5 ) @ ( or @ SY31 @ SV14 ) ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[45]) ).
thf(56,plain,
! [SV15: $i,SV6: $i] :
( ( ( implies @ SV6 @ SV15 )
= ( or @ ( not @ SV6 ) @ SV15 ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[46]) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [SV7: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ SV7 )
= $true )
| ( ( ~ ( axiom @ SV7 ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
thf(58,plain,
! [SV8: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
= $true )
| ( ( ! [SY27: $i] :
( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ SY27 @ SV8 ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ SY27 ) ) )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[48]) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [SV16: $i,SV9: $i] :
( ( ( and @ SV9 @ SV16 )
= ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ SV9 ) @ ( not @ SV16 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[49]) ).
thf(60,plain,
! [SV17: $i,SV10: $i] :
( ( ( equivalent @ SV10 @ SV17 )
= ( and @ ( implies @ SV10 @ SV17 ) @ ( implies @ SV17 @ SV10 ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[50]) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [SV18: $i,SV13: $i,SV4: $i] :
( ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV4 @ ( or @ SV13 @ SV18 ) ) @ ( or @ SV13 @ ( or @ SV4 @ SV18 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
thf(62,plain,
! [SV19: $i,SV14: $i,SV5: $i] :
( ( axiom @ ( implies @ ( implies @ SV5 @ SV14 ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ SV19 @ SV5 ) @ ( or @ SV19 @ SV14 ) ) ) )
= $true ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[55]) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [SV7: $i] :
( ( ( axiom @ SV7 )
= $false )
| ( ( theorem @ SV7 )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[57]) ).
thf(64,plain,
! [SV8: $i,SV20: $i] :
( ( ( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ SV20 @ SV8 ) )
| ~ ( theorem @ SV20 ) )
= $true )
| ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_forall_pos,[status(thm)],[58]) ).
thf(65,plain,
! [SV8: $i,SV20: $i] :
( ( ( ~ ( theorem @ ( implies @ SV20 @ SV8 ) ) )
= $true )
| ( ( ~ ( theorem @ SV20 ) )
= $true )
| ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_or_pos,[status(thm)],[64]) ).
thf(66,plain,
! [SV8: $i,SV20: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ ( implies @ SV20 @ SV8 ) )
= $false )
| ( ( ~ ( theorem @ SV20 ) )
= $true )
| ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
thf(67,plain,
! [SV8: $i,SV20: $i] :
( ( ( theorem @ SV20 )
= $false )
| ( ( theorem @ ( implies @ SV20 @ SV8 ) )
= $false )
| ( ( theorem @ SV8 )
= $true ) ),
inference(extcnf_not_pos,[status(thm)],[66]) ).
thf(68,plain,
$false = $true,
inference(fo_atp_e,[status(thm)],[40,67,63,62,61,60,59,56,53,52,51,41]) ).
thf(69,plain,
$false,
inference(solved_all_splits,[solved_all_splits(join,[])],[68]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL265-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : leo --timeout %d --proofoutput 1 --foatp e --atp e=./eprover %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 06:02:15 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 No.of.Axioms: 11
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 Length.of.Defs: 0
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 Contains.Choice.Funs: false
% 0.14/0.35 (rf:0,axioms:11,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:600,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:13,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:0,translation:fof_full)...
% 4.12/4.35
% 4.12/4.35 ********************************
% 4.12/4.35 * All subproblems solved! *
% 4.12/4.35 ********************************
% 4.12/4.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:11,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:68,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
% 4.12/4.35
% 4.12/4.35 %**** Beginning of derivation protocol ****
% 4.12/4.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.12/4.35
% 4.12/4.35 %**** End of derivation protocol ****
% 4.12/4.35 %**** no. of clauses in derivation: 69 ****
% 4.12/4.35 %**** clause counter: 68 ****
% 4.12/4.35
% 4.12/4.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : (rf:0,axioms:11,ps:3,u:6,ude:true,rLeibEQ:true,rAndEQ:true,use_choice:true,use_extuni:true,use_extcnf_combined:true,expand_extuni:false,foatp:e,atp_timeout:74,atp_calls_frequency:10,ordering:none,proof_output:1,protocol_output:false,clause_count:68,loop_count:0,foatp_calls:1,translation:fof_full)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------