TSTP Solution File: LCL259-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL259-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5c7A5vqNSh true
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:59:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.96s 2.33s
% Output : Refutation 11.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL259-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.5c7A5vqNSh true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:37:32 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.19/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.19/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 11.96/2.33 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 11.96/2.33 % BCE start: 9
% 11.96/2.33 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 11.96/2.33 % PE start: 9
% 11.96/2.33 logic: eq
% 11.96/2.33 % PE eliminated: 1
% 11.96/2.33 % done 885 iterations in 1.597s
% 11.96/2.33 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 11.96/2.33 % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_type, type, axiom: $i > $o).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(p_type, type, p: $i).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(or_type, type, or: $i > $i > $i).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(q_type, type, q: $i).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(theorem_type, type, theorem: $i > $o).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(implies_definition, axiom,
% 11.96/2.33 (( implies @ X @ Y ) = ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_1_5, axiom,
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @
% 11.96/2.33 ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X2)) @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_5])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(rule_1, axiom, (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( axiom @ X ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)) @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(rule_2, axiom,
% 11.96/2.33 (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ) ) |
% 11.96/2.33 ( ~( theorem @ Y ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl50, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl82, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ (not @ X2) @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl50])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl85, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl82, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_1_4, axiom,
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_4])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl42, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ X0)) | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl237, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | (theorem @ (or @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl85, zip_derived_cl42])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_1_6, axiom,
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @
% 11.96/2.33 ( implies @
% 11.96/2.33 ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ C @ A ) @ ( or @ C @ B ) ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (axiom @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X2 @ X0) @ (or @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X2) @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_1_2, axiom, (axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ A ) @ A ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i]: (axiom @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X2) @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl62, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ (not @ X1) @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl35])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl64, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl62, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl87, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl87, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl64, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl87, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | (theorem @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X3 @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl87, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl281, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ (or @ X0 @ X0)))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31, zip_derived_cl113])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl296, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl281])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)) @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl51, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ (not @ X2) @ X0)) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl51, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl89, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ (not @ X1) @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl55])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl91, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)) @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl89, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl105, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl91, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl381, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl296, zip_derived_cl105])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7622, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl381, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(prove_this, conjecture,
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 ( implies @ ( implies @ p @ ( implies @ p @ q ) ) @ ( implies @ p @ q ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 11.96/2.33 (~( theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 ( implies @ ( implies @ p @ ( implies @ p @ q ) ) @ ( implies @ p @ q ) ) )),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (~ (theorem @
% 11.96/2.33 (implies @ (implies @ p @ (implies @ p @ q)) @ (implies @ p @ q)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7879, plain, (~ (theorem @ (or @ (implies @ p @ q) @ p))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7622, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7891, plain, (~ (theorem @ (implies @ p @ (or @ p @ q)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl237, zip_derived_cl7879])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(axiom_1_3, axiom, (axiom @ ( implies @ A @ ( or @ B @ A ) ))).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (axiom @ (implies @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_3])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl33, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 11.96/2.33 [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl103, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl87, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl121, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 11.96/2.33 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 11.96/2.33 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X0 @ X1))))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl33, zip_derived_cl103])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl535, plain,
% 11.96/2.33 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (or @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl121])).
% 11.96/2.33 thf(zip_derived_cl7892, plain, ($false),
% 11.96/2.33 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7891, zip_derived_cl535])).
% 11.96/2.33
% 11.96/2.33 % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.96/2.33
% 11.96/2.33
% 11.96/2.33 % Terminating...
% 12.56/2.41 % Runner terminated.
% 12.59/2.42 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------