TSTP Solution File: LCL250-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL250-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:29:07 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.49s 7.69s
% Output : Refutation 7.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : LCL250-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 04:07:10 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.37 Sun Jul 3 04:07:10 2022
% 0.21/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 25715.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 list(usable).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.21/0.37 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.21/0.37 in usable.
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.37 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.37
% 0.21/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.21/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.21/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.21/0.40 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.21/0.40 distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.40 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40
% 0.21/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 4 [ 1 1 1120 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 6 [ 12 1 192 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 7 [ 1 9 57415 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Model 8 [ 1 22 154462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12
% 4.96/5.12 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 1375 givens.
% 4.96/5.12
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Changing weight limit from 57 to 47.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Resetting weight limit to 47 after 2700 givens.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Changing weight limit from 47 to 40.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 2705 givens.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Changing weight limit from 40 to 39.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.43/5.67 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 2710 givens.
% 5.43/5.67
% 5.51/5.68
% 5.51/5.68
% 5.51/5.68 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 5.51/5.68
% 5.51/5.68 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 2720 givens.
% 5.51/5.68
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 2740 givens.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 2745 givens.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 2750 givens.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.69 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 2755 givens.
% 5.51/5.69
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 2780 givens.
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.71 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 2800 givens.
% 5.51/5.71
% 5.51/5.73
% 5.51/5.73
% 5.51/5.73 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 5.51/5.73
% 5.51/5.73 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 2835 givens.
% 5.51/5.73
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 2840 givens.
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.74 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 2855 givens.
% 5.51/5.74
% 5.51/5.76
% 5.51/5.76
% 5.51/5.76 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 5.51/5.76
% 5.51/5.76 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 2880 givens.
% 5.51/5.76
% 5.60/5.78
% 5.60/5.78
% 5.60/5.78 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 5.60/5.78
% 5.60/5.78 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 2915 givens.
% 5.60/5.78
% 5.63/5.82
% 5.63/5.82
% 5.63/5.82 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 5.63/5.82
% 5.63/5.82 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 2960 givens.
% 5.63/5.82
% 5.65/5.88
% 5.65/5.88
% 5.65/5.88 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 5.65/5.88
% 5.65/5.88 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 3080 givens.
% 5.65/5.88
% 5.73/5.91
% 5.73/5.91
% 5.73/5.91 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 5.73/5.91
% 5.73/5.91 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 3130 givens.
% 5.73/5.91
% 5.80/6.03
% 5.80/6.03
% 5.80/6.03 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 5.80/6.03
% 5.80/6.03 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 3300 givens.
% 5.80/6.03
% 5.80/6.07
% 5.80/6.07
% 5.80/6.07 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 5.80/6.07
% 5.80/6.07 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 3365 givens.
% 5.80/6.07
% 6.09/6.27
% 6.09/6.27
% 6.09/6.27 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 6.09/6.27
% 6.09/6.27 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 3700 givens.
% 6.09/6.27
% 6.09/6.31
% 6.09/6.31
% 6.09/6.31 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 6.09/6.31
% 6.09/6.31 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 3790 givens.
% 6.09/6.31
% 6.50/6.71
% 6.50/6.71
% 6.50/6.71 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 6.50/6.71
% 6.50/6.71 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 4535 givens.
% 6.50/6.71
% 6.67/6.87
% 6.67/6.87
% 6.67/6.87 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 6.67/6.87
% 6.67/6.87 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 5000 givens.
% 6.67/6.87
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 -------- PROOF --------
% 7.49/7.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.49/7.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 7.26 sec ----> 23971 [binary,23970.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 Length of proof is 16. Level of proof is 16.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.49/7.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.49/7.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 7.49/7.69 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 7.49/7.69 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 7.49/7.69 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(not(or(not(p),not(q)))),r))).
% 7.49/7.69 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 7.49/7.69 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 7.49/7.69 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 7.49/7.69 8 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 7.49/7.69 9 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 7.49/7.69 12 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 7.49/7.69 14 [hyper,12,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))).
% 7.49/7.69 25 [hyper,8,2,14] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(A),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 56 [hyper,25,2,9] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,or(not(not(B)),C)))).
% 7.49/7.69 707 [hyper,56,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,or(not(not(A)),C)))).
% 7.49/7.69 998 [hyper,707,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,A)),or(not(not(B)),C)))).
% 7.49/7.69 1160 [hyper,998,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(A)),C)),B)).
% 7.49/7.69 1284 [hyper,1160,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(B,C)),or(not(not(B)),D)),C))).
% 7.49/7.69 3333 [hyper,1284,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(A)),C)),or(D,B))).
% 7.49/7.69 5900 [hyper,3333,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(not(A)),B))),or(not(not(A)),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 7392 [hyper,5900,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(not(A)),or(A,B))),or(not(not(A)),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 8325 [hyper,7392,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(A)),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 8333 [hyper,8325,3,7] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(B)),A))).
% 7.49/7.69 8349 [hyper,8333,3,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(not(not(or(A,C))),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 21394 [hyper,8349,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(or(C,B))),A))).
% 7.49/7.69 23970 [hyper,21394,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(not(or(C,A))),B))).
% 7.49/7.69 23971 [binary,23970.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.49/7.69 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 ============ end of search ============
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 true clauses given 3257 (35.2%)
% 7.49/7.69 false clauses given 5996
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 FALSE TRUE
% 7.49/7.69 13 0 181
% 7.49/7.69 14 0 16
% 7.49/7.69 15 0 2195
% 7.49/7.69 16 0 105
% 7.49/7.69 17 2087 2
% 7.49/7.69 tot: 2087 2499 (54.5% true)
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 Model 8 [ 1 22 154462 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.49/7.69
% 7.49/7.69 Process 25715 finished Sun Jul 3 04:07:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------