TSTP Solution File: LCL239-3 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : LCL239-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:04:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.72s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (   4 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   52 (  14 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( theorem(A)
    | ~ axiom(A) ),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( theorem(A)
    | ~ theorem(implies(B,A))
    | ~ theorem(B) ),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ~ theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    implies(A,B) = or(not(A),B),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    or(not(A),B) = implies(A,B),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[10])]),
    [iquote('copy,10,flip.1')] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    and(A,B) = not(or(not(A),not(B))),
    file('LCL239-3.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(15,plain,
    not(implies(A,not(B))) = and(A,B),
    inference(flip,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[13]),12])]),
    [iquote('copy,13,demod,12,flip.1')] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[5,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,5,1')] ).

cnf(17,plain,
    theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[6,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,6,1')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,1')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1')] ).

cnf(43,plain,
    theorem(implies(implies(A,B),or(B,not(A)))),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,12]),
    [iquote('para_into,20.1.1.1,11.1.1')] ).

cnf(79,plain,
    theorem(or(or(A,B),not(B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[43,2,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,43,2,17')] ).

cnf(108,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(or(B,C),not(C)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[79,2,17]),
    [iquote('hyper,79,2,17')] ).

cnf(167,plain,
    theorem(or(or(A,B),or(C,not(B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[108,2,33]),
    [iquote('hyper,108,2,33')] ).

cnf(205,plain,
    theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),or(C,B))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[167,2,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,167,2,20')] ).

cnf(276,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(or(B,not(C)),C))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[205,2,33]),
    [iquote('hyper,205,2,33')] ).

cnf(281,plain,
    theorem(or(or(A,not(B)),B)),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[276,2,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,276,2,16')] ).

cnf(285,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(B,not(A)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[281,2,20]),
    [iquote('hyper,281,2,20')] ).

cnf(287,plain,
    theorem(or(A,or(B,not(B)))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[285,2,33]),
    [iquote('hyper,285,2,33')] ).

cnf(296,plain,
    theorem(or(A,not(A))),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[287,2,16]),
    [iquote('hyper,287,2,16')] ).

cnf(301,plain,
    theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))),
    inference(para_into,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[296,12]),
    [iquote('para_into,296.1.1,11.1.1')] ).

cnf(305,plain,
    theorem(not(and(A,not(A)))),
    inference(demod,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[301,2,301]),15]),
    [iquote('hyper,301,2,301,demod,15')] ).

cnf(306,plain,
    $false,
    inference(binary,[status(thm)],[305,3]),
    [iquote('binary,305.1,3.1')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LCL239-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:37:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.72/1.92  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.72/1.92  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.72/1.92  Wed Jul 27 09:37:04 2022
% 1.72/1.92  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 3819.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.72/1.92  set(auto).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.72/1.92  clear(print_given).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  list(usable).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] implies(X,Y)=or(not(X),Y).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] theorem(X)| -axiom(X).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] theorem(X)| -theorem(implies(Y,X))| -theorem(Y).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] and(P,Q)=not(or(not(P),not(Q))).
% 1.72/1.92  0 [] -theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))).
% 1.72/1.92  end_of_list.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 1.72/1.92  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.72/1.92  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.72/1.92     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process usable:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 1 [] theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] theorem(A)| -theorem(implies(B,A))| -theorem(B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 3 [] -theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))).
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ------------> process sos:
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 8 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 9 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 11 [copy,10,flip.1] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 14 [copy,13,demod,12,flip.1] not(implies(A,not(B)))=and(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92  ---> New Demodulator: 15 [new_demod,14] not(implies(A,not(B)))=and(A,B).
% 1.72/1.92    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.72/1.92  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.72/1.92  >>>> Starting back demodulation with 15.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  sos_size=199
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.01 sec ----> 306 [binary,305.1,3.1] $F.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Length of proof is 18.  Level of proof is 13.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.72/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.72/1.92  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ============ end of search ============
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.72/1.92  clauses given                 85
% 1.72/1.92  clauses generated           1572
% 1.72/1.92  clauses kept                 300
% 1.72/1.92  clauses forward subsumed    1071
% 1.72/1.92  clauses back subsumed          6
% 1.72/1.92  Kbytes malloced             4882
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.72/1.92  user CPU time          0.01          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  wall-clock time        1             (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.72/1.92  
% 1.72/1.92  Process 3819 finished Wed Jul 27 09:37:05 2022
% 1.72/1.92  Otter interrupted
% 1.72/1.92  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------