TSTP Solution File: LCL239-10 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL239-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:53:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.68s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  34 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   7   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   8 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    ifeq: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    axiom: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    true: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    theorem: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    p: $i ).

cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(rule_2,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_2) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_4) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))) != true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(and_defn,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_defn) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    axiom(implies(X1,or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ifeq(theorem(implies(X1,X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    rule_2 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ifeq(axiom(X1),true,theorem(X1),true) = true,
    rule_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
    ifeq_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X2),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    axiom_1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(X1),X2)),true,ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(X2),true),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),X3)),true,theorem(X3),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    theorem(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_20]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,or(not(X2),X2))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(or(X1,X2)),true,theorem(or(X2,X1)),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    theorem(or(not(X1),X1)) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_24]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    theorem(or(X1,not(X1))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(and(p,not(p)))) != true,
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_defn ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ifeq(theorem(X1),true,theorem(not(not(X1))),true) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_27]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    theorem(not(not(or(not(p),not(not(p)))))) != true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    theorem(not(not(or(X1,not(X1))))) = true,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_27]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.15  % Problem    : LCL239-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.15/0.16  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.39  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.39  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.39  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.39  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.39  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.39  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 06:06:56 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.65  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.24/0.68  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.24/0.68  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.68  % Proof found
% 0.24/0.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.68  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.69  % Total time : 0.019000 s
% 0.24/0.69  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.69  % Total time : 0.021000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------