TSTP Solution File: LCL237-3 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LCL237-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:48:38 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 63.96s 64.02s
% Output : CNFRefutation 63.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL237-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 03:08:00 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.59 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 63.96/64.01 %-------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.01 % File :CSE---1.6
% 63.96/64.01 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 63.96/64.01 % Transform :cnf
% 63.96/64.01 % Format :tptp:raw
% 63.96/64.01 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 63.96/64.01
% 63.96/64.01 % Result :Theorem 63.350000s
% 63.96/64.01 % Output :CNFRefutation 63.350000s
% 63.96/64.01 %-------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 % File : LCL237-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 63.96/64.02 % Domain : Logic Calculi (Propositional)
% 63.96/64.02 % Problem : Principia Mathematica 3.21
% 63.96/64.02 % Version : [WR27] axioms.
% 63.96/64.02 % English :
% 63.96/64.02
% 63.96/64.02 % Refs : [WR27] Whitehead & Russell (1927), Principia Mathematica
% 63.96/64.02 % Source : [WR27]
% 63.96/64.02 % Names : Problem 3.21 [WR27]
% 63.96/64.02
% 63.96/64.02 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 63.96/64.02 % Rating : 0.17 v8.1.0, 0.11 v7.5.0, 0.10 v7.4.0, 0.22 v7.2.0, 0.25 v7.1.0, 0.29 v6.4.0, 0.14 v6.3.0, 0.17 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.44 v5.5.0, 0.50 v5.4.0, 0.47 v5.3.0, 0.33 v5.2.0, 0.50 v5.1.0, 0.43 v5.0.0, 0.29 v4.1.0, 0.44 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0, 0.50 v3.5.0, 0.17 v3.4.0, 0.33 v3.3.0, 0.43 v3.2.0, 0.14 v3.1.0, 0.33 v2.6.0, 0.14 v2.5.0, 0.20 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.3.0
% 63.96/64.02 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 63.96/64.02 % Number of literals : 13 ( 2 equ; 4 neg)
% 63.96/64.02 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 63.96/64.02 % Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 63.96/64.02 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 63.96/64.02 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 63.96/64.02 % Number of variables : 18 ( 1 sgn)
% 63.96/64.02 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 63.96/64.02
% 63.96/64.02 % Comments :
% 63.96/64.02 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 %----Include axioms of propositional logic
% 63.96/64.02 include('Axioms/LCL004-0.ax').
% 63.96/64.02 include('Axioms/LCL004-1.ax').
% 63.96/64.02 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 63.96/64.02 ~ theorem(implies(q,implies(p,and(p,q)))) ).
% 63.96/64.02
% 63.96/64.02 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 %-------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.02 % Proof found
% 63.96/64.02 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 63.96/64.02 % SZS output start Proof
% 63.96/64.03 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 63.96/64.03 %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 63.96/64.03 %MaxLitNum:3
% 63.96/64.03 %MaxfuncDepth:5
% 63.96/64.03 %SharedTerms:9
% 63.96/64.03 %goalClause: 6
% 63.96/64.03 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 63.96/64.03 [6]~P2(f2(f1(a3),f2(f1(a4),f1(f2(f1(a4),f1(a3))))))
% 63.96/64.03 [2]P1(f2(f1(f2(x21,x21)),x21))
% 63.96/64.03 [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),f2(x12,x11)))
% 63.96/64.03 [3]P1(f2(f1(f2(x31,x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 63.96/64.03 [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,f2(x42,x43))),f2(x42,f2(x41,x43))))
% 63.96/64.03 [5]P1(f2(f1(f2(f1(x51),x52)),f2(f1(f2(x53,x51)),f2(x53,x52))))
% 63.96/64.03 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)
% 63.96/64.03 [8]P2(x81)+~P2(x82)+~P2(f2(f1(x82),x81))
% 63.96/64.03 %EqnAxiom
% 63.96/64.03
% 63.96/64.03 %-------------------------------------------
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(20,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 (P2(f2(f1(f2(x201,x202)),f2(x202,x201)))),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,7])).
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(24,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 (P2(f2(f1(f2(x241,f2(x242,x243))),f2(x242,f2(x241,x243))))),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7])).
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(28,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 (P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(x281),x282)),f2(f1(f2(x283,x281)),f2(x283,x282))))),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(78,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 (P2(f2(x781,f2(f1(f2(x782,x781)),x782)))),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,24,8])).
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(3786,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 (P2(f2(f1(f2(x37861,f2(x37862,x37863))),f2(x37861,f2(x37863,x37862))))),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[20,28,8])).
% 63.96/64.04 cnf(3790,plain,
% 63.96/64.04 ($false),
% 63.96/64.04 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,78,3786,8]),
% 63.96/64.04 ['proof']).
% 63.96/64.05 % SZS output end Proof
% 63.96/64.05 % Total time :63.350000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------