TSTP Solution File: LCL236-1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : LCL236-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:35:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.41s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
~ theorem(or__dfg(not__dfg(or__dfg(not__dfg(p),not__dfg(q))),not__dfg(not__dfg(or__dfg(not__dfg(p),not__dfg(q)))))),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(2,axiom,
axiom(or__dfg(not__dfg(or__dfg(u,u)),u)),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(3,axiom,
axiom(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),or__dfg(v,u))),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(4,axiom,
axiom(or__dfg(not__dfg(or__dfg(u,v)),or__dfg(v,u))),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(5,axiom,
axiom(or__dfg(not__dfg(or__dfg(u,or__dfg(v,w))),or__dfg(v,or__dfg(u,w)))),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ axiom(u)
| theorem(u) ),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ theorem(u)
| ~ axiom(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),v))
| theorem(v) ),
file('LCL236-1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(21,plain,
( ~ theorem(or__dfg(u,u))
| theorem(u) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[2,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:2.0,8.1')] ).
cnf(23,plain,
( ~ theorem(or__dfg(u,v))
| theorem(or__dfg(v,u)) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:4.0,8.1')] ).
cnf(27,plain,
( ~ axiom(or__dfg(u,v))
| theorem(or__dfg(v,u)) ),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[23,7]),
[iquote('0:SoR:23.0,7.1')] ).
cnf(30,plain,
( ~ theorem(or__dfg(u,or__dfg(v,w)))
| theorem(or__dfg(v,or__dfg(u,w))) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[5,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:5.0,8.1')] ).
cnf(33,plain,
theorem(or__dfg(or__dfg(u,v),not__dfg(v))),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[27,3]),
[iquote('0:SoR:27.0,3.0')] ).
cnf(35,plain,
theorem(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),or__dfg(v,u))),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[23,33]),
[iquote('0:SoR:23.0,33.0')] ).
cnf(44,plain,
theorem(or__dfg(u,or__dfg(not__dfg(v),v))),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[30,35]),
[iquote('0:SoR:30.0,35.0')] ).
cnf(52,plain,
theorem(or__dfg(not__dfg(u),u)),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[21,44]),
[iquote('0:SoR:21.0,44.0')] ).
cnf(55,plain,
theorem(or__dfg(u,not__dfg(u))),
inference(sor,[status(thm)],[23,52]),
[iquote('0:SoR:23.0,52.0')] ).
cnf(57,plain,
$false,
inference(unc,[status(thm)],[55,1]),
[iquote('0:UnC:55.0,1.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LCL236-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 05:31:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.41 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS derived 38 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 38 clauses.
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS allocated 75686 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.41 SPASS spent 0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.41 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41
% 0.18/0.41 Here is a proof with depth 7, length 17 :
% 0.18/0.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.41 Formulae used in the proof : prove_this axiom_1_2 axiom_1_3 axiom_1_4 axiom_1_5 rule_1 rule_2
% 0.18/0.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------