TSTP Solution File: LCL234-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL234-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JamZcjsGi5 true
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:57 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 64.89s 9.97s
% Output : Refutation 64.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL234-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JamZcjsGi5 true
% 0.19/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.19/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.19/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 18:57:09 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.19/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.19/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.19/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.63 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.63 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 64.89/9.97 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 64.89/9.97 % BCE start: 10
% 64.89/9.97 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 64.89/9.97 % PE start: 10
% 64.89/9.97 logic: eq
% 64.89/9.97 % PE eliminated: 1
% 64.89/9.97 % done 2791 iterations in 9.213s
% 64.89/9.97 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 64.89/9.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% 64.89/9.97 thf(p_type, type, p: $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(axiom_type, type, axiom: $i > $o).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(q_type, type, q: $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(or_type, type, or: $i > $i > $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(and_type, type, and: $i > $i > $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(theorem_type, type, theorem: $i > $o).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(not_type, type, not: $i > $i).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(prove_this, conjecture,
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ ( implies @ p @ ( implies @ q @ ( and @ p @ q ) ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 64.89/9.97 (~( theorem @ ( implies @ p @ ( implies @ q @ ( and @ p @ q ) ) ) )),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_this])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ p @ (implies @ q @ (and @ p @ q))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(implies_definition, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (( implies @ X @ Y ) = ( or @ ( not @ X ) @ Y ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(axiom_1_4, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @ ( implies @ ( or @ A @ B ) @ ( or @ B @ A ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_4])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(rule_1, axiom, (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( axiom @ X ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ X1) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 64.89/9.97 [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl75, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X0)) @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl48])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(and_defn, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (( and @ P @ Q ) = ( not @ ( or @ ( not @ P ) @ ( not @ Q ) ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ((and @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (or @ (not @ X0) @ (not @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [and_defn])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ((and @ X0 @ X1) = (not @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ((implies @ (implies @ X1 @ (not @ X0)) @ X2)
% 64.89/9.97 = (or @ (and @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl37, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl154, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (or @ (and @ X1 @ X0) @ (implies @ X0 @ (not @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl75, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(axiom_1_5, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @
% 64.89/9.97 ( implies @ ( or @ A @ ( or @ B @ C ) ) @ ( or @ B @ ( or @ A @ C ) ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (or @ X1 @ X2)) @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl35, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)) @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 64.89/9.97 [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(rule_2, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (( theorem @ X ) | ( ~( theorem @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ) ) |
% 64.89/9.97 ( ~( theorem @ Y ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl165, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (or @ (not @ X1) @ (or @ X2 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl55])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl168, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl165, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl1117, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (or @ (and @ X0 @ X1) @ (not @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl154, zip_derived_cl168])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X0 @ (not @ X1)) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(axiom_1_6, axiom,
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @
% 64.89/9.97 ( implies @
% 64.89/9.97 ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( or @ C @ A ) @ ( or @ C @ B ) ) ))).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (axiom @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (or @ X2 @ X0) @ (or @ X2 @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [axiom_1_6])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (![X0 : $i]: ( (theorem @ X0) | ~ (axiom @ X0))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_1])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl36, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 64.89/9.97 (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X2) @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 64.89/9.97 [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl69, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ X1 @ X2) @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl36, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl212, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (or @ (not @ X1) @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl69])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl214, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl212, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ X0)
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [rule_2])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl216, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 64.89/9.97 | (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl214, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl250, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X0 @ (not @ X1)))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl48, zip_derived_cl216])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl42604, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X0 @ (and @ X0 @ X1))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 64.89/9.97 [zip_derived_cl1117, zip_derived_cl250])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (or @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl35, zip_derived_cl7])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl164, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (or @ (not @ X2) @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl55])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl167, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (or @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (or @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl164, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl1076, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (or @ (not @ X2) @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl167])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((implies @ X0 @ X1) = (or @ (not @ X0) @ X1))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [implies_definition])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl1079, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 ( (theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))
% 64.89/9.97 | ~ (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1076, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl42710, plain,
% 64.89/9.97 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 64.89/9.97 (theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X0 @ (and @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)],
% 64.89/9.97 [zip_derived_cl42604, zip_derived_cl1079])).
% 64.89/9.97 thf(zip_derived_cl42850, plain, ($false),
% 64.89/9.97 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9, zip_derived_cl42710])).
% 64.89/9.97
% 64.89/9.97 % SZS output end Refutation
% 64.89/9.97
% 64.89/9.97
% 64.89/9.97 % Terminating...
% 65.36/10.06 % Runner terminated.
% 65.36/10.08 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------