TSTP Solution File: LCL230-2 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL230-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.24s 300.22s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 4 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( p
| r
| ~ q ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hQ5dByRtjC/E---3.1_17035.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
q,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hQ5dByRtjC/E---3.1_17035.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hQ5dByRtjC/E---3.1_17035.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
~ r,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hQ5dByRtjC/E---3.1_17035.p',clause_4) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p
| r
| ~ q ),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
q,
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ p,
clause_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ r,
clause_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.10 % Problem : LCL230-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:14:10 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hQ5dByRtjC/E---3.1_17035.p
% 0.24/300.22 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.24/300.22 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.22 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17113 completed with status 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.24/300.22 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.22 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/300.22 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/300.22 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting new_bool_1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting sh5l with 146s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 17117 completed with status 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.24/300.22 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSLSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/300.22 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/300.22 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/300.22 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/300.22 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 901s (1) cores
% 0.24/300.22 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/300.22 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/300.22
% 0.24/300.22 # Proof found!
% 0.24/300.22 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/300.22 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/300.22 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.24/300.22 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.24/300.22 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.24/300.22 # Processed clauses : 4
% 0.24/300.22 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.24/300.22 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # NegExts : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/300.22 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.24/300.22 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/300.22 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.24/300.22 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/300.22 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/300.22 # Termbank termtop insertions : 30
% 0.24/300.22
% 0.24/300.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/300.22 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/300.22 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.24/300.22 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/300.22 # Maximum resident set size: 1576 pages
% 0.24/300.22
% 0.24/300.22 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/300.22 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/300.22 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/300.22 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.24/300.22 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.24/300.22 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.24/300.22 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------