TSTP Solution File: LCL226-3 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL226-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:12:05 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 2 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ theorem(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',rule_2) ).
cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',implies_definition) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(or(q,r),implies(or(not(r),s),or(q,s)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X1))
| ~ theorem(X2) ),
rule_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
implies_definition ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ theorem(or(not(X2),X1)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
rule_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
axiom(implies(or(X1,or(X2,X3)),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
axiom_1_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ theorem(X2)
| ~ axiom(or(not(X2),X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(or(q,r),implies(or(not(r),s),or(q,s)))),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3)))
| ~ theorem(or(X2,or(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
axiom(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(or(X3,X1),or(X3,X2)))),
axiom_1_6 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(q,r)),or(not(or(not(r),s)),or(q,s)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( theorem(or(X1,or(X2,X3)))
| ~ axiom(or(X2,or(X1,X3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X1),X2)),or(not(or(X3,X1)),or(X3,X2)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_7]),c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LCL226-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:37:13 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JF9AOTPBgP/E---3.1_1887.p
% 0.21/0.52 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 2015 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2027 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Result found by C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.52 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.52 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.52 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.52 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.52 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.21/0.52 # Processed clauses : 72
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # ...subsumed : 14
% 0.21/0.52 # ...remaining for further processing : 58
% 0.21/0.52 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Generated clauses : 86
% 0.21/0.52 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 77
% 0.21/0.52 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Paramodulations : 86
% 0.21/0.52 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of processed clauses : 50
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.52 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Negative unit clauses : 17
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit-clauses : 28
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18
% 0.21/0.52 # ...number of literals in the above : 49
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.21/0.52 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 193
% 0.21/0.52 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 193
% 0.21/0.52 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 12
% 0.21/0.52 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.21/0.52 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match attempts : 19
% 0.21/0.52 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.52 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1311
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.21/0.52
% 0.21/0.52 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.52 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.21/0.52 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Total time : 0.071 s
% 0.21/0.52 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------