TSTP Solution File: LCL226-3 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LCL226-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:48:34 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL226-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 02:09:23 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.010000s
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % File : LCL226-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.20/0.60 % Domain : Logic Calculi (Propositional)
% 0.20/0.60 % Problem : Principia Mathematica 2.8
% 0.20/0.60 % Version : [WR27] axioms.
% 0.20/0.60 % English :
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [WR27] Whitehead & Russell (1927), Principia Mathematica
% 0.20/0.60 % Source : [WR27]
% 0.20/0.60 % Names : Problem 2.8 [WR27]
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.44 v5.5.0, 0.38 v5.4.0, 0.40 v5.3.0, 0.42 v5.2.0, 0.38 v5.1.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.00 v4.1.0, 0.22 v4.0.1, 0.17 v4.0.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.29 v3.2.0, 0.14 v3.1.0, 0.22 v2.7.0, 0.17 v2.6.0, 0.00 v2.5.0, 0.20 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.3.0
% 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of literals : 12 ( 1 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 16 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.20/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %----Include axioms of propositional logic
% 0.20/0.60 include('Axioms/LCL004-0.ax').
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60 ~ theorem(implies(or(q,r),implies(or(not(r),s),or(q,s)))) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.60 %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.60 %VarNum:28(SingletonVarNum:14)
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.20/0.60 %SharedTerms:12
% 0.20/0.60 %goalClause: 6
% 0.20/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.60 [6]~P2(f2(f1(f2(a3,a4)),f2(f1(f2(f1(a4),a5)),f2(a3,a5))))
% 0.20/0.60 [2]P1(f2(f1(f2(x21,x21)),x21))
% 0.20/0.60 [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),f2(x12,x11)))
% 0.20/0.60 [3]P1(f2(f1(f2(x31,x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 0.20/0.60 [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,f2(x42,x43))),f2(x42,f2(x41,x43))))
% 0.20/0.60 [5]P1(f2(f1(f2(f1(x51),x52)),f2(f1(f2(x53,x51)),f2(x53,x52))))
% 0.20/0.60 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)
% 0.20/0.60 [8]P2(x81)+~P2(x82)+~P2(f2(f1(x82),x81))
% 0.20/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(24,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (P2(f2(f1(f2(x241,f2(x242,x243))),f2(x242,f2(x241,x243))))),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(28,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(x281),x282)),f2(f1(f2(x283,x281)),f2(x283,x282))))),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(40,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 ($false),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[24,28,6,8]),
% 0.20/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time :0.010000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------