%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : LCL225-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 00:34:03 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP29006/LCL/LCL225-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 10] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 4858] [nf = 1] [nu = 2912] [ut = 1587]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 21230] [nf = 4] [nu = 16880] [ut = 3635]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 109 secs [nr = 55400293] [nf = 46] [nu = 55163724] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 122 secs [nr = 60825211] [nf = 24690] [nu = 60480131] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 60902245] [nf = 24691] [nu = 60537139] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 60988086] [nf = 24698] [nu = 60602492] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 116681270
% 	resolvents: 116656090	factors: 25180
% Number of unit clauses generated: 115714766
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.17
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 6		[1] = 6		[2] = 1575	[3] = 2048	
% [4] = 28365	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 115714766	[2] = 903856	[3] = 62631	[4] = 17	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] axiom_1		(+)5	(-)14621
% [1] theorem_1		(+)17063	(-)311
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)17068	(-)14932
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1545629
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 116681270
% Number of unification failures: 311546119
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 5379698
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 3840148
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2936
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 20012080
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 42530
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 2689
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 110159561
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 63
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 280761
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 929453
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.53
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.30
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 428227389
% ConstructUnitClause() = 74524
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.30 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 388938
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------