TSTP Solution File: LCL224-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL224-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:51 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 62.02s 62.24s
% Output : Refutation 62.02s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL224-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 22:17:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36 Sun Jul 3 22:17:53 2022
% 0.12/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14050.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.36 in usable.
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36
% 0.12/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.12/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.12/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.12/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Changing weight limit from 60 to 46.
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.09/4.27 Resetting weight limit to 46 after 1085 givens.
% 4.09/4.27
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06 Changing weight limit from 46 to 37.
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 2890 givens.
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.06 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 2895 givens.
% 4.86/5.06
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Changing weight limit from 36 to 33.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 2900 givens.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 2905 givens.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Changing weight limit from 32 to 29.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.07 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 2910 givens.
% 4.86/5.07
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.08 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 2915 givens.
% 4.86/5.08
% 4.86/5.09
% 4.86/5.09
% 4.86/5.09 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 4.86/5.09
% 4.86/5.09 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 2930 givens.
% 4.86/5.09
% 4.92/5.09
% 4.92/5.09
% 4.92/5.09 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 4.92/5.09
% 4.92/5.09 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 2940 givens.
% 4.92/5.09
% 4.92/5.10
% 4.92/5.10
% 4.92/5.10 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 4.92/5.10
% 4.92/5.10 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 2960 givens.
% 4.92/5.10
% 4.92/5.14
% 4.92/5.14
% 4.92/5.14 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 4.92/5.14
% 4.92/5.14 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 3040 givens.
% 4.92/5.14
% 4.92/5.15
% 4.92/5.15
% 4.92/5.15 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 4.92/5.15
% 4.92/5.15 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 3075 givens.
% 4.92/5.15
% 5.00/5.22
% 5.00/5.22
% 5.00/5.22 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 5.00/5.22
% 5.00/5.22 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 3200 givens.
% 5.00/5.22
% 5.04/5.24
% 5.04/5.24
% 5.04/5.24 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 5.04/5.24
% 5.04/5.24 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 3250 givens.
% 5.04/5.24
% 5.20/5.37
% 5.20/5.37
% 5.20/5.37 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 5.20/5.37
% 5.20/5.37 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 3580 givens.
% 5.20/5.37
% 5.20/5.41
% 5.20/5.41
% 5.20/5.41 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 5.20/5.41
% 5.20/5.41 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 3695 givens.
% 5.20/5.41
% 5.44/5.63
% 5.44/5.63
% 5.44/5.63 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 5.44/5.63
% 5.44/5.63 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 4330 givens.
% 5.44/5.63
% 5.44/5.66
% 5.44/5.66
% 5.44/5.66 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 5.44/5.66
% 5.44/5.66 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 4430 givens.
% 5.44/5.66
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 41225 givens.
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18 Changing weight limit from 18 to 19.
% 16.00/16.18
% 16.00/16.18 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 41230 givens.
% 16.00/16.18
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 61.33 sec ----> 144201 [binary,144200.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 Length of proof is 38. Level of proof is 38.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 62.02/62.24 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 62.02/62.24 % SZS output start Refutation
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 62.02/62.24 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 62.02/62.24 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 62.02/62.24 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(p,or(not(q),r))),or(not(or(p,q)),or(p,r)))).
% 62.02/62.24 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 62.02/62.24 6 [] {-} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 62.02/62.24 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 62.02/62.24 8 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 62.02/62.24 9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 62.02/62.24 17 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 62.02/62.24 28 [hyper,17,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))).
% 62.02/62.24 165 [hyper,28,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(B,A),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 173 [hyper,165,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 755 [hyper,173,2,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,or(or(B,C),D)))).
% 62.02/62.24 1282 [hyper,755,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(B,C),D)))).
% 62.02/62.24 1773 [hyper,1282,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(B,C),D)),A)).
% 62.02/62.24 2112 [hyper,1773,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(B,C)),or(or(C,D),E)),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 5635 [hyper,2112,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(B,C),D)),or(E,A))).
% 62.02/62.24 11196 [hyper,5635,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(or(A,B),C),A)),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 15622 [hyper,11196,3,7] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 29731 [hyper,15622,3,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 39106 [hyper,29731,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,C))),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 39111 [hyper,39106,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),C))),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 39116 [hyper,39111,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 39149 [hyper,39116,3,7] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(B,A),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 39282 [hyper,39149,3,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 39478 [hyper,39282,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(C,A),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 39485 [hyper,39478,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(A,B),or(not(or(or(B,C),A)),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 39488 [hyper,39485,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),B),or(C,A))).
% 62.02/62.24 39491 [hyper,39488,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(or(B,C),D)),C),or(D,B)))).
% 62.02/62.24 39782 [hyper,39491,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),B),or(D,or(C,A)))).
% 62.02/62.24 40027 [hyper,39782,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(or(B,C),D)),C),or(E,or(D,B))))).
% 62.02/62.24 45839 [hyper,40027,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),B),or(D,or(E,or(C,A))))).
% 62.02/62.24 51682 [hyper,45839,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(A,or(B,or(C,D))),or(not(or(or(D,E),C)),E))).
% 62.02/62.24 56524 [hyper,51682,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(D,or(E,or(C,A))),B))).
% 62.02/62.24 60518 [hyper,56524,3,7] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(D,or(E,or(A,B))),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 73433 [hyper,60518,3,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(D,or(E,or(B,A))),C))).
% 62.02/62.24 85384 [hyper,73433,2,8] {+} theorem(or(or(A,or(B,or(C,D))),or(not(or(D,or(C,E))),E))).
% 62.02/62.24 94002 [hyper,85384,2,5] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(C,or(B,A))))),or(C,or(B,A)))).
% 62.02/62.24 102811 [hyper,94002,2,6] {+} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,or(C,or(D,or(C,B))))),or(D,or(C,B))))).
% 62.02/62.24 112701 [hyper,102811,2,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(C,or(B,A))))),or(D,or(C,or(B,A))))).
% 62.02/62.24 124277 [hyper,112701,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(A,C)))),or(D,or(B,or(A,C))))).
% 62.02/62.24 128800 [hyper,124277,3,8] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(B,C)))),or(D,or(A,or(B,C))))).
% 62.02/62.24 132496 [hyper,128800,3,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),or(B,C))),or(D,or(not(or(B,A)),or(B,C))))).
% 62.02/62.24 138436 [hyper,132496,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(not(B),or(C,D))),or(not(or(C,B)),or(C,D))))).
% 62.02/62.24 144198 [hyper,138436,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),or(B,C))),or(not(or(B,A)),or(B,C)))).
% 62.02/62.24 144200 [hyper,144198,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,C)))).
% 62.02/62.24 144201 [binary,144200.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 % SZS output end Refutation
% 62.02/62.24 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 ============ end of search ============
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 true clauses given 35329 (36.0%)
% 62.02/62.24 false clauses given 62883
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 FALSE TRUE
% 62.02/62.24 17 0 9
% 62.02/62.24 18 0 102
% 62.02/62.24 19 2234 2388
% 62.02/62.24 tot: 2234 2499 (52.8% true)
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 Model 3 (0.01 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 62.02/62.24
% 62.02/62.24 Process 14050 finished Sun Jul 3 22:18:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------