TSTP Solution File: LCL223-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL223-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 51.74s 51.94s
% Output : Refutation 51.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LCL223-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 10:53:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n019.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sun Jul 3 10:53:08 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30934.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36 in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.13/0.40 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.13/0.40 distinct function count: 2
% 0.13/0.40 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Changing weight limit from 60 to 37.
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76
% 0.54/0.76 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 1115 givens.
% 0.54/0.76
% 1.52/1.75
% 1.52/1.75
% 1.52/1.75 Changing weight limit from 37 to 35.
% 1.52/1.75
% 1.52/1.75 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 3890 givens.
% 1.52/1.75
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 3900 givens.
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76 Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.52/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 3910 givens.
% 1.52/1.76
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 3950 givens.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.78 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 3955 givens.
% 1.60/1.78
% 1.60/1.79
% 1.60/1.79
% 1.60/1.79 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 1.60/1.79
% 1.60/1.79 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 3970 givens.
% 1.60/1.79
% 1.60/1.80
% 1.60/1.80
% 1.60/1.80 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 1.60/1.80
% 1.60/1.80 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 3990 givens.
% 1.60/1.80
% 1.63/1.81
% 1.63/1.81
% 1.63/1.81 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.63/1.81
% 1.63/1.81 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 4055 givens.
% 1.63/1.81
% 1.63/1.82
% 1.63/1.82
% 1.63/1.82 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.63/1.82
% 1.63/1.82 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 4070 givens.
% 1.63/1.82
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 4150 givens.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 4175 givens.
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 4290 givens.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.92
% 1.65/1.92
% 1.65/1.92 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 1.65/1.92
% 1.65/1.92 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 4370 givens.
% 1.65/1.92
% 1.74/1.95
% 1.74/1.95
% 1.74/1.95 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 1.74/1.95
% 1.74/1.95 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 4465 givens.
% 1.74/1.95
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.80/2.01 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 4615 givens.
% 1.80/2.01
% 1.91/2.10
% 1.91/2.10
% 1.91/2.10 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.91/2.10
% 1.91/2.10 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 4940 givens.
% 1.91/2.10
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.24/2.46 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 6280 givens.
% 2.24/2.46
% 2.40/2.58
% 2.40/2.58
% 2.40/2.58 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.40/2.58
% 2.40/2.58 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 6850 givens.
% 2.40/2.58
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Changing weight limit from 17 to 18.
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 40540 givens.
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Changing weight limit from 18 to 19.
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 40545 givens.
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Changing weight limit from 19 to 20.
% 11.26/11.51
% 11.26/11.51 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 40550 givens.
% 11.26/11.51
% 12.52/12.73
% 12.52/12.73
% 12.52/12.73 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 12.52/12.73
% 12.52/12.73 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 43040 givens.
% 12.52/12.73
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 51.03 sec ----> 145207 [binary,145206.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 Length of proof is 32. Level of proof is 32.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 51.74/51.94 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 51.74/51.94 % SZS output start Refutation
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 51.74/51.94 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 51.74/51.94 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 51.74/51.94 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(p,q)),or(not(or(p,or(not(q),r))),or(p,r)))).
% 51.74/51.94 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 51.74/51.94 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 51.74/51.94 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 51.74/51.94 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 51.74/51.94 9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 51.74/51.94 12 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 51.74/51.94 14 [hyper,12,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))).
% 51.74/51.94 76 [hyper,14,2,9] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,or(B,C)))).
% 51.74/51.94 668 [hyper,76,2,9] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(A,or(B,or(C,D))))).
% 51.74/51.94 6475 [hyper,668,2,8] {+} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(C,D))))).
% 51.74/51.94 25298 [hyper,6475,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(C,D))),A)).
% 51.74/51.94 27927 [hyper,25298,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(B,or(C,D))),or(C,or(D,E))),B))).
% 51.74/51.94 39484 [hyper,27927,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(C,D))),or(E,A))).
% 51.74/51.94 46276 [hyper,39484,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(A,B),or(not(or(B,or(C,D))),or(C,or(D,E))))).
% 51.74/51.94 51213 [hyper,46276,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(D,A),or(B,or(C,E))))).
% 51.74/51.94 56552 [hyper,51213,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(D,B),or(A,or(C,E))))).
% 51.74/51.94 60712 [hyper,56552,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(D,A),or(C,or(B,E))))).
% 51.74/51.94 63431 [hyper,60712,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(A,B),or(not(or(or(B,C),D)),or(D,or(C,E))))).
% 51.74/51.94 65331 [hyper,63431,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(C,or(B,D))),or(E,A))).
% 51.74/51.94 67092 [hyper,65331,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(or(B,C),D)),or(D,or(C,E))),or(F,B)))).
% 51.74/51.94 78729 [hyper,67092,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(C,or(B,D))),or(E,or(F,A)))).
% 51.74/51.94 86902 [hyper,78729,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(A,or(B,C)),or(not(or(or(C,D),E)),or(E,or(D,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 97457 [hyper,86902,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(D,or(E,A)),or(C,or(B,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 105458 [hyper,97457,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(D,or(E,B)),or(A,or(C,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 111767 [hyper,105458,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(C,or(D,A)),or(E,or(B,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 111772 [hyper,111767,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(C,or(D,B)),or(E,or(A,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 111776 [hyper,111772,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(A,or(B,C)),or(not(or(D,C)),or(E,or(D,F))))).
% 51.74/51.94 111785 [hyper,111776,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(B,or(C,D)),or(not(or(E,D)),or(F,or(E,G)))))).
% 51.74/51.94 119121 [hyper,111785,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(A,or(B,C)),or(D,or(not(or(E,C)),or(F,or(E,G)))))).
% 51.74/51.94 127009 [hyper,119121,2,5] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,or(C,or(B,D)))),or(C,or(B,D))))).
% 51.74/51.94 127010 [hyper,127009,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(A,C)))),or(D,or(B,or(A,C))))).
% 51.74/51.94 127013 [hyper,127010,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,or(B,C)))),or(D,or(A,or(B,C))))).
% 51.74/51.94 127019 [hyper,127013,3,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),or(B,C))),or(D,or(not(or(B,A)),or(B,C))))).
% 51.74/51.94 133470 [hyper,127019,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(D,or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,C))))).
% 51.74/51.94 139285 [hyper,133470,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,or(not(C),D))),or(not(or(B,C)),or(B,D))))).
% 51.74/51.94 145203 [hyper,139285,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,C)))).
% 51.74/51.94 145206 [hyper,145203,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(A,or(not(B),C))),or(A,C)))).
% 51.74/51.94 145207 [binary,145206.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 % SZS output end Refutation
% 51.74/51.94 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 ============ end of search ============
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 true clauses given 31796 (32.4%)
% 51.74/51.94 false clauses given 66326
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 FALSE TRUE
% 51.74/51.94 17 0 1
% 51.74/51.94 19 2400 2492
% 51.74/51.94 tot: 2400 2493 (51.0% true)
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 Model 3 (0.01 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 51.74/51.94
% 51.74/51.94 Process 30934 finished Sun Jul 3 10:54:00 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------