TSTP Solution File: LCL208-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : LCL208-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:21:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.60s 3.77s
% Output : Refutation 3.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 8 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X,X)),X)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(or(not(X),or(Y,X))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X,Y)),or(Y,X))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X,or(Y,Z))),or(Y,or(X,Z)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(X),Y)),or(not(or(Z,X)),or(Z,Y)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( theorem(X)
| ~ axiom(X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( theorem(X)
| ~ axiom(or(not(Y),X))
| ~ theorem(Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(rule_3,axiom,
( theorem(or(not(X),Y))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X),Z))
| ~ theorem(or(not(Z),Y)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_3) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(p,q)),or(not(not(p)),q))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(11,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X,X)),X)),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_1,axiom_1_2]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
~ theorem(or(not(or(q,p)),or(not(not(p)),q))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_3,prove_this,axiom_1_4]) ).
cnf(50,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X,or(Y,Y))),or(X,Y))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_2,11,axiom_1_6]) ).
cnf(808,plain,
~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(or(q,p)),q))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_2,20,axiom_1_5]) ).
cnf(1655,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(not(X),Y)),or(not(or(Y,X)),Y))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_3,50,axiom_1_6]) ).
cnf(2124,plain,
~ theorem(or(not(or(X,not(p))),or(not(or(q,p)),q))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_3,808,axiom_1_3]) ).
cnf(14937,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[rule_3,2124,axiom_1_4,1655]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LCL208-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 2 14:26:30 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.46 *
% 0.18/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 "."
% 0.18/0.47 *
% 0.18/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T14:26:30
% 0.18/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-07-02T14:26:30
% 3.60/3.77
% 3.60/3.77
% 3.60/3.77 #||
% 3.60/3.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/3.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.60/3.77 ||#
% 3.60/3.77
% 3.60/3.77 ; Summary of computation:
% 3.60/3.77 ; 17221 formulas have been input or derived (from 411 formulas).
% 3.60/3.77 ; 14937 (87%) were retained. Of these,
% 3.60/3.77 ; 14937 (100%) are still being kept.
% 3.60/3.77 ;
% 3.60/3.77 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.003 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Assert (9 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1.606 49% Process new row (16,252 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.561 17% Resolution (820 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.149 5% Paramodulation (410 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (3 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (3 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (3 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (3 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.421 13% Forward simplification (16,252 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.467 14% Backward simplification (14,937 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 0.097 3% Other
% 3.60/3.77 ; 3.304 Total
% 3.60/3.77 ; 3.306 Real time
% 3.60/3.77 ;
% 3.60/3.77 ; Term-hash-array has 31,237 terms in all.
% 3.60/3.77 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 3 entries (3 at peak, 3 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 15 nodes (15 at peak, 15 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Retrieved 3 possibly forward subsuming rows in 3 calls.
% 3.60/3.77 ; Retrieved 0 possibly backward subsumed rows in 3 calls.
% 3.60/3.77 ; Path-index has 31,239 entries (31,239 at peak, 31,239 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Path-index has 3,323 nodes (3,323 at peak, 3,323 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Trie-index has 31,239 entries (31,239 at peak, 31,239 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Trie-index has 67,404 nodes (67,404 at peak, 67,404 added, 0 deleted).
% 3.60/3.77 ; Retrieved 135,917 generalization terms in 16,307 calls.
% 3.60/3.77 ; Retrieved 30,648 instance terms in 14,933 calls.
% 3.60/3.77 ; Retrieved 80,576 unifiable terms in 13,268 calls.
% 3.60/3.77 ;
% 3.60/3.77 ; The agenda of rows to process has 216 entries:
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1 with value 14 1 with value 26 26 with value 35
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1 with value 15 1 with value 28 36 with value 36
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1 with value 17 2 with value 29 45 with value 37
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1 with value 19 2 with value 30 33 with value 38
% 3.60/3.77 ; 3 with value 20 10 with value 31 3 with value 39
% 3.60/3.77 ; 5 with value 22 2 with value 32 2 with value 40
% 3.60/3.77 ; 2 with value 23 14 with value 33 1 with value 45
% 3.60/3.77 ; 2 with value 24 18 with value 34 1 with value 46
% 3.60/3.77 ; 3 with value 25
% 3.60/3.77 ; The agenda of rows to give has 14526 entries:
% 3.60/3.77 ; 99 with value (4 21) 1466 with value (4 31) 6 with value (4 41)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 165 with value (4 22) 1803 with value (4 32) 2 with value (4 42)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 141 with value (4 23) 1874 with value (4 33) 7 with value (4 43)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 225 with value (4 24) 1832 with value (4 34) 4 with value (4 44)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 247 with value (4 25) 1533 with value (4 35) 2 with value (4 46)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 307 with value (4 26) 953 with value (4 36) 1 with value (4 48)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 432 with value (4 27) 552 with value (4 37) 1 with value (4 52)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 623 with value (4 28) 243 with value (4 38) 1 with value (4 53)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 805 with value (4 29) 22 with value (4 39) 1 with value (4 60)
% 3.60/3.77 ; 1175 with value (4 30) 4 with value (4 40)
% 3.60/3.77 Evaluation took:
% 3.60/3.77 3.307 seconds of real time
% 3.60/3.77 3.130865 seconds of user run time
% 3.60/3.77 0.17581 seconds of system run time
% 3.60/3.77 [Run times include 0.506 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.60/3.77 0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.60/3.77 0 page faults and
% 3.60/3.77 211,944,216 bytes consed.
% 3.60/3.77 :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.60/3.78 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-02T14:26:33
% 3.60/3.78 :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.60/3.78 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------