TSTP Solution File: LCL203-3 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : LCL203-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.73s 1.94s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL203-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:32:19 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.73/1.94 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.73/1.94 The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 1.73/1.94 Wed Jul 27 09:32:19 2022
% 1.73/1.94 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 21709.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.73/1.94 set(auto).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.73/1.94 clear(print_given).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 list(usable).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] implies(X,Y)=or(not(X),Y).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] theorem(X)| -axiom(X).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] theorem(X)| -theorem(implies(Y,X))| -theorem(Y).
% 1.73/1.94 0 [] -theorem(implies(not(or(p,q)),or(not(p),not(q)))).
% 1.73/1.94 end_of_list.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 1.73/1.94 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 1.73/1.94 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.73/1.94 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ------------> process usable:
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 1 [] theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] theorem(A)| -theorem(implies(B,A))| -theorem(B).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=11): 3 [] -theorem(implies(not(or(p,q)),or(not(p),not(q)))).
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ------------> process sos:
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 4 [] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 5 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=6): 6 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 8 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=12): 9 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 1.73/1.94 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 11 [copy,10,flip.1] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.73/1.94 ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.73/1.94 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [copy,4,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.73/1.94 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.73/1.94 >> back demodulating 3 with 12.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 9.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 sos_size=166
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 8.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 sos_size=186
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ============ end of search ============
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.73/1.94 clauses given 290
% 1.73/1.94 clauses generated 21862
% 1.73/1.94 clauses kept 300
% 1.73/1.94 clauses forward subsumed 9480
% 1.73/1.94 clauses back subsumed 7
% 1.73/1.94 Kbytes malloced 7812
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.73/1.94 user CPU time 0.05 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.94 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.73/1.94 wall-clock time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Process 21709 finished Wed Jul 27 09:32:20 2022
% 1.73/1.94 Otter interrupted
% 1.73/1.94 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------