TSTP Solution File: LCL197-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL197-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.40s 3.61s
% Output   : Refutation 3.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : LCL197-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 02:30:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul  3 02:30:40 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 15246.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.36  in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.12/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.12/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.12/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.12/0.40     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.12/0.40     distinct function count: 2
% 0.12/0.40     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.40/3.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.40/3.61  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Model 3 [ 1 0 277 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Model 5 [ 12 0 78 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   3.23 sec ----> 802 [binary,801.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.40/3.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.40/3.61  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 3.40/3.61  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 3.40/3.61  3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 3.40/3.61  4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(q,or(p,q))),or(p,q))).
% 3.40/3.61  5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 3.40/3.61  8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 3.40/3.61  9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 3.40/3.61  10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 3.40/3.61  68 [hyper,9,2,10] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(A,B))).
% 3.40/3.61  801 [hyper,68,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,A))),or(B,A))).
% 3.40/3.61  802 [binary,801.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.40/3.61  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  ============ end of search ============
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  true clauses given          53      (30.1%)
% 3.40/3.61  false clauses given        123
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.40/3.61     9  0         26
% 3.40/3.61    11  2         62
% 3.40/3.61    12  0         1
% 3.40/3.61    13  101       29
% 3.40/3.61    14  1         5
% 3.40/3.61    15  103       16
% 3.40/3.61    16  5         5
% 3.40/3.61    17  63        9
% 3.40/3.61    18  8         5
% 3.40/3.61    19  33        6
% 3.40/3.61    20  10        5
% 3.40/3.61    21  24        2
% 3.40/3.61    22  7         1
% 3.40/3.61    23  9         0
% 3.40/3.61    24  1         0
% 3.40/3.61    25  5         0
% 3.40/3.61    26  6         0
% 3.40/3.61    27  2         2
% 3.40/3.61    28  3         0
% 3.40/3.61    29  1         0
% 3.40/3.61    31  5         0
% 3.40/3.61    32  1         0
% 3.40/3.61    33  3         0
% 3.40/3.61    35  1         0
% 3.40/3.61  tot:  394       174      (30.6% true)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.40/3.61  
% 3.40/3.61  Process 15246 finished Sun Jul  3 02:30:43 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------