TSTP Solution File: LCL195-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL195-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.92s 2.08s
% Output : Refutation 1.92s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL195-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 16:09:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Mon Jul 4 16:09:40 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 28937.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Changing weight limit from 60 to 37.
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85
% 0.59/0.85 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 1135 givens.
% 0.59/0.85
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85 Changing weight limit from 37 to 34.
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.85 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 3950 givens.
% 1.65/1.85
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 3960 givens.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 3970 givens.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.86 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 3990 givens.
% 1.65/1.86
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 3995 givens.
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.87 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 4015 givens.
% 1.65/1.87
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 4030 givens.
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.88 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 4050 givens.
% 1.65/1.88
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.89 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 4065 givens.
% 1.65/1.89
% 1.65/1.90
% 1.65/1.90
% 1.65/1.90 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.65/1.90
% 1.65/1.90 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 4075 givens.
% 1.65/1.90
% 1.65/1.91
% 1.65/1.91
% 1.65/1.91 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 1.65/1.91
% 1.65/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 4110 givens.
% 1.65/1.91
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 4160 givens.
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.97
% 1.75/1.97
% 1.75/1.97 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 1.75/1.97
% 1.75/1.97 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 4280 givens.
% 1.75/1.97
% 1.75/1.99
% 1.75/1.99
% 1.75/1.99 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 1.75/1.99
% 1.75/1.99 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 4340 givens.
% 1.75/1.99
% 1.83/2.06
% 1.83/2.06
% 1.83/2.06 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.83/2.06
% 1.83/2.06 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 4535 givens.
% 1.83/2.06
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.92/2.08 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.92/2.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.68 sec ----> 17934 [binary,17933.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 6.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.92/2.08 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.92/2.08 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 1.92/2.08 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 1.92/2.08 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 1.92/2.08 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(q,p)),or(r,p)))).
% 1.92/2.08 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 1.92/2.08 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 1.92/2.08 9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 1.92/2.08 12 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 1.92/2.08 48 [hyper,9,2,12] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(A,or(C,B)))).
% 1.92/2.08 339 [hyper,48,3,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(B,C)))).
% 1.92/2.08 3505 [hyper,339,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(B),C)),or(C,A)))).
% 1.92/2.08 9530 [hyper,3505,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(A),C)),or(C,B)))).
% 1.92/2.08 17933 [hyper,9530,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(A,C)),or(B,C)))).
% 1.92/2.08 17934 [binary,17933.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.92/2.08 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 ============ end of search ============
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 true clauses given 1141 (24.7%)
% 1.92/2.08 false clauses given 3473
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 FALSE TRUE
% 1.92/2.08 13 0 616
% 1.92/2.08 14 0 24
% 1.92/2.08 15 1180 897
% 1.92/2.08 16 52 53
% 1.92/2.08 17 1270 498
% 1.92/2.08 18 0 80
% 1.92/2.08 19 3 279
% 1.92/2.08 20 0 52
% 1.92/2.08 tot: 2505 2499 (49.9% true)
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.92/2.08
% 1.92/2.08 Process 28937 finished Mon Jul 4 16:09:42 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------