TSTP Solution File: LCL193-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : LCL193-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:50:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 35.18s 35.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 35.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))) ).
cnf(axiom_1_6,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( theorem(X)
| ~ axiom(X) ) ).
cnf(rule_2,axiom,
( theorem(X)
| ~ axiom(or(not(Y),X))
| ~ theorem(Y) ) ).
cnf(rule_3,axiom,
( theorem(or(not(X),Z))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X),Y))
| ~ theorem(or(not(Y),Z)) ) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(p,q)),or(r,p)))) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(not(A),X_70432)),or(not(or(X_70431,A)),or(X_70431,X_70432)))),
inference(subst,[],[axiom_1_6:[bind(B,$fot(X_70432)),bind(C,$fot(X_70431))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7)))
| theorem(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_1:[bind(X,$fot(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
axiom(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))),
inference(subst,[],[axiom_1_4:[bind(A,$fot(X_7)),bind(B,$fot(X_8))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_1]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B))))
| ~ theorem(or(not(A),B))
| theorem(or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B))) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_2:[bind(X,$fot(or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),bind(Y,$fot(or(not(A),B)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(A),B))
| theorem(or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B))) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))) )],[axiom_1_6,refute_0_4]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7)))
| theorem(or(not(or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7)))) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(A,$fot(or(X_7,X_8))),bind(B,$fot(or(X_8,X_7))),bind(C,$fot(X_285))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7)))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(not(or(X_7,X_8)),or(X_8,X_7))) )],[refute_0_3,refute_0_6]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X_440),or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))))
| ~ theorem(or(not(or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7))))
| theorem(or(not(X_440),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7)))) ),
inference(subst,[],[rule_3:[bind(X,$fot(X_440)),bind(Y,$fot(or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8)))),bind(Z,$fot(or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7))))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(X_440),or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))))
| theorem(or(not(X_440),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7)))) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(not(or(X_285,or(X_7,X_8))),or(X_285,or(X_8,X_7)))) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
( ~ axiom(or(not(or(not(A),X_70432)),or(not(or(X_70431,A)),or(X_70431,X_70432))))
| theorem(or(not(or(not(A),X_70432)),or(not(or(X_70431,A)),or(X_70432,X_70431)))) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(X_285,$fot(not(or(X_70431,A)))),bind(X_440,$fot(or(not(A),X_70432))),bind(X_7,$fot(X_70431)),bind(X_8,$fot(X_70432))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(not(A),X_70432)),or(not(or(X_70431,A)),or(X_70432,X_70431)))),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( axiom(or(not(or(not(A),X_70432)),or(not(or(X_70431,A)),or(X_70431,X_70432)))) )],[refute_0_0,refute_0_10]) ).
cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(p,q)),or(r,p)))),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(A,$fot(q)),bind(X_70431,$fot(p)),bind(X_70432,$fot(r))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( theorem(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(p,q)),or(r,p)))) )],[refute_0_12,prove_this]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL193-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 10:53:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.33 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 35.18/35.36 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.18/35.36
% 35.18/35.36 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 35.18/35.37
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------