TSTP Solution File: LCL192-10 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : LCL192-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:03:50 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.76s 1.91s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL192-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 09:20:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.76/1.91 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.76/1.91 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 1.76/1.91 Wed Jul 27 09:20:16 2022
% 1.76/1.91 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 7463.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.76/1.91 set(auto).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.76/1.91 clear(print_given).
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 list(usable).
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] A=A.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] implies(X,Y)=or(not(X),Y).
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] ife_q(axiom(X),true,theorem(X),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] ife_q(theorem(implies(Y,X)),true,ife_q(theorem(Y),true,theorem(X),true),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 0 [] theorem(implies(or(or(p,q),r),or(p,or(q,r))))!=true.
% 1.76/1.91 end_of_list.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 1.76/1.91 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(para_from).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(para_into).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 1.76/1.91 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 ------------> process usable:
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 1 [] theorem(implies(or(or(p,q),r),or(p,or(q,r))))!=true.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 ------------> process sos:
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=7): 3 [] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] ife_q(A,A,B,C)=B.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 5 [] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 6 [new_demod,5] axiom(implies(or(A,A),A))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 7 [] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 8 [new_demod,7] axiom(implies(A,or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=10): 9 [] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 10 [new_demod,9] axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A)))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 11 [] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 12 [new_demod,11] axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=14): 13 [] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 14 [new_demod,13] axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B))))=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 16 [copy,15,flip.1] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 17 [new_demod,16] or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=9): 18 [] ife_q(axiom(A),true,theorem(A),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 19 [new_demod,18] ife_q(axiom(A),true,theorem(A),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=16): 20 [] ife_q(theorem(implies(A,B)),true,ife_q(theorem(A),true,theorem(B),true),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 ---> New Demodulator: 21 [new_demod,20] ife_q(theorem(implies(A,B)),true,ife_q(theorem(A),true,theorem(B),true),true)=true.
% 1.76/1.91 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 6.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 8.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 10.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 12.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 14.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 17.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 19.
% 1.76/1.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 21.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 13.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 13.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 sos_size=91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 12.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 12.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 sos_size=113
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Resetting weight limit to 10.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 sos_size=110
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 ============ end of search ============
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.76/1.91 clauses given 266
% 1.76/1.91 clauses generated 15470
% 1.76/1.91 clauses kept 302
% 1.76/1.91 clauses forward subsumed 13834
% 1.76/1.91 clauses back subsumed 0
% 1.76/1.91 Kbytes malloced 8789
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.76/1.91 user CPU time 0.09 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.76/1.91 system CPU time 0.01 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.76/1.91 wall-clock time 2 (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.76/1.91
% 1.76/1.91 Process 7463 finished Wed Jul 27 09:20:18 2022
% 1.76/1.91 Otter interrupted
% 1.76/1.91 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------