TSTP Solution File: LCL191-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL191-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:30 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.23s 3.41s
% Output : Refutation 3.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL191-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 20:05:22 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.35 Mon Jul 4 20:05:22 2022
% 0.14/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24586.
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.14/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.35 in usable.
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.35
% 0.14/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.14/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.14/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.14/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.14/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.14/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.14/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.14/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.14/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.14/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 Changing weight limit from 60 to 37.
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 1115 givens.
% 0.55/0.74
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Changing weight limit from 37 to 35.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 3890 givens.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 3900 givens.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.71 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 3910 givens.
% 1.53/1.71
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 3950 givens.
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73 Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.73 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 3955 givens.
% 1.53/1.73
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74 Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74 Resetting weight limit to 29 after 3970 givens.
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74 Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.74 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 3990 givens.
% 1.53/1.74
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 4055 givens.
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.53/1.76 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 4070 givens.
% 1.53/1.76
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.79 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 4150 givens.
% 1.61/1.79
% 1.61/1.80
% 1.61/1.80
% 1.61/1.80 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 1.61/1.80
% 1.61/1.80 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 4175 givens.
% 1.61/1.80
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.83 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 4290 givens.
% 1.66/1.83
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.86 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 4370 givens.
% 1.66/1.86
% 1.66/1.89
% 1.66/1.89
% 1.66/1.89 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 1.66/1.89
% 1.66/1.89 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 4465 givens.
% 1.66/1.89
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.75/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 4615 givens.
% 1.75/1.94
% 1.83/2.03
% 1.83/2.03
% 1.83/2.03 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.83/2.03
% 1.83/2.03 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 4940 givens.
% 1.83/2.03
% 2.14/2.38
% 2.14/2.38
% 2.14/2.38 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 2.14/2.38
% 2.14/2.38 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 6280 givens.
% 2.14/2.38
% 2.24/2.50
% 2.24/2.50
% 2.24/2.50 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 2.24/2.50
% 2.24/2.50 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 6850 givens.
% 2.24/2.50
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.23/3.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.23/3.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.97 sec ----> 30349 [binary,30348.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 Length of proof is 17. Level of proof is 17.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.23/3.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.23/3.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 3.23/3.41 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 3.23/3.41 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 3.23/3.41 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(p,or(q,r))),or(or(p,q),r))).
% 3.23/3.41 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 3.23/3.41 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 3.23/3.41 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 3.23/3.41 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 3.23/3.41 9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 3.23/3.41 12 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 3.23/3.41 14 [hyper,12,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))).
% 3.23/3.41 73 [hyper,14,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(B,A),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 146 [hyper,73,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 705 [hyper,146,2,9] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(A,or(or(B,C),D)))).
% 3.23/3.41 6660 [hyper,705,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,or(or(A,C),D)))).
% 3.23/3.41 6670 [hyper,6660,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(B,A)),or(or(B,C),D)))).
% 3.23/3.41 6687 [hyper,6670,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(A,C),D)),B)).
% 3.23/3.41 6698 [hyper,6687,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(B,C)),or(or(B,D),E)),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 14034 [hyper,6698,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,B)),or(or(A,C),D)),or(E,B))).
% 3.23/3.41 21131 [hyper,14034,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 24490 [hyper,21131,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 27109 [hyper,24490,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,C))),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 3.23/3.41 29078 [hyper,27109,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),C))),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 3.23/3.41 30337 [hyper,29078,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(or(A,C),B))).
% 3.23/3.41 30342 [hyper,30337,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(B,A),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 30348 [hyper,30342,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(or(A,B),C))).
% 3.23/3.41 30349 [binary,30348.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.23/3.41 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 ============ end of search ============
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 true clauses given 2564 (23.4%)
% 3.23/3.41 false clauses given 8391
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 FALSE TRUE
% 3.23/3.41 13 2 0
% 3.23/3.41 15 446 2103
% 3.23/3.41 16 91 146
% 3.23/3.41 17 1961 251
% 3.23/3.41 tot: 2500 2500 (50.0% true)
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.23/3.41
% 3.23/3.41 Process 24586 finished Mon Jul 4 20:05:25 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------