TSTP Solution File: LCL186-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LCL186-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:55:51 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_3,axiom,
( theorem(or(not(X1),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_3) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),q))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(axiom_1_4,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL003-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( theorem(or(not(X1),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( theorem(or(not(X1),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| ~ theorem(or(not(X3),X2)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( theorem(or(not(X1),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X1),X3))
| ~ axiom(or(not(X3),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),q))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( theorem(or(not(X1),X2))
| ~ axiom(or(not(or(X3,X1)),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
axiom(or(not(or(X1,X2)),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_4 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),q))),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
theorem(or(not(X1),or(X1,X2))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : LCL186-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 01:54:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13145 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13150 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.49 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.22/0.49 # Processed clauses : 56
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # ...subsumed : 9
% 0.22/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.22/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Generated clauses : 67
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 61
% 0.22/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Paramodulations : 67
% 0.22/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.22/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 37
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.22/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 18
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.22/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 45
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.22/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 105
% 0.22/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 105
% 0.22/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.22/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.22/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 29
% 0.22/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1134
% 0.22/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 17
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.22/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.22/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------