TSTP Solution File: LCL186-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL186-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:35 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.24s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   8 unt;   6 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  11   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   4   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ theorem > axiom > or > #nlpp > not > q > p

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(theorem,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(q,type,
    q: $i ).

tff(axiom,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_55,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_82,axiom,
    ! [X,Z,Y] :
      ( theorem(or(not(X),Z))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(X),Y))
      | ~ theorem(or(not(Y),Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_86,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),q))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_5] : axiom(or(not(or(A_4,B_5)),or(B_5,A_4))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_2,B_3] : axiom(or(not(A_2),or(B_3,A_2))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_55]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_12] :
      ( ~ axiom(X_12)
      | theorem(X_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_81,plain,
    ! [Y_35,Z_36,X_37] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(not(Y_35),Z_36))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(X_37),Y_35))
      | theorem(or(not(X_37),Z_36)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_82]) ).

tff(c_406,plain,
    ! [X_84,Y_85,Z_86] :
      ( ~ axiom(or(not(X_84),Y_85))
      | theorem(or(not(X_84),Z_86))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y_85),Z_86)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_81]) ).

tff(c_442,plain,
    ! [A_89,Z_90,B_91] :
      ( theorem(or(not(A_89),Z_90))
      | ~ axiom(or(not(or(B_91,A_89)),Z_90)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_406]) ).

tff(c_461,plain,
    ! [B_5,A_4] : theorem(or(not(B_5),or(B_5,A_4))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_442]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(not(p)),or(not(p),q))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_477,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_461,c_18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : LCL186-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:50:50 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.24/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.24/1.91  
% 3.24/1.91  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.61/1.93  
% 3.61/1.93  Inference rules
% 3.61/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.61/1.93  #Ref     : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Sup     : 107
% 3.61/1.93  #Fact    : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Split   : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 3.61/1.93  
% 3.61/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 3.61/1.93  
% 3.61/1.93  Simplification rules
% 3.61/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.61/1.93  #Subsume      : 34
% 3.61/1.93  #Demod        : 1
% 3.61/1.93  #Tautology    : 3
% 3.61/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.61/1.93  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.61/1.93  
% 3.61/1.93  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.61/1.93  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.61/1.93  
% 3.61/1.93  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.61/1.93  ----------------------
% 3.61/1.94  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 3.61/1.94  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.61/1.94  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.61/1.94  Main loop            : 0.43
% 3.61/1.94  Inferencing          : 0.19
% 3.61/1.94  Reduction            : 0.10
% 3.61/1.94  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.61/1.94  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.61/1.94  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 3.61/1.94  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.61/1.94  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.61/1.94  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.61/1.94  Total                : 0.90
% 3.61/1.94  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.61/1.94  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.61/1.94  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.61/1.94  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------