TSTP Solution File: LCL182-3 by iProver---3.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.8
% Problem : LCL182-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 07:42:56 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 49.26s 7.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 49.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 37 ( 23 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 53 ( 6 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 81 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(implies(implies(p,q),implies(not(q),not(p)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
axiom(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
axiom(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
axiom(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_4) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_5) ).
cnf(c_54,plain,
axiom(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_6) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
or(not(X0),X1) = implies(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
( ~ axiom(X0)
| theorem(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ theorem(X0)
| theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_2) ).
cnf(c_100,plain,
( implies(or(X0,X0),X0) != X1
| theorem(X1) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_101,plain,
theorem(implies(or(X0,X0),X0)),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_100]) ).
cnf(c_106,plain,
( implies(X0,or(X1,X0)) != X2
| theorem(X2) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_107,plain,
theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X0))),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_106]) ).
cnf(c_112,plain,
( implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0)) != X2
| theorem(X2) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_113,plain,
theorem(implies(or(X0,X1),or(X1,X0))),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_112]) ).
cnf(c_118,plain,
( implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2))) != X3
| theorem(X3) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_119,plain,
theorem(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_118]) ).
cnf(c_124,plain,
( implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1))) != X3
| theorem(X3) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_125,plain,
theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(X2,X0),or(X2,X1)))),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_124]) ).
cnf(c_8366,plain,
theorem(implies(or(X0,not(X1)),implies(X1,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_113]) ).
cnf(c_8369,plain,
theorem(implies(implies(X0,not(X1)),implies(X1,not(X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_8366]) ).
cnf(c_8373,plain,
theorem(implies(or(not(X0),or(X1,X2)),or(X1,implies(X0,X2)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_119]) ).
cnf(c_8374,plain,
theorem(implies(implies(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,implies(X0,X2)))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8373,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_8379,plain,
theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(or(not(X2),X0),implies(X2,X1)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_125]) ).
cnf(c_8380,plain,
theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1)))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_8379,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_8394,plain,
( ~ theorem(or(X0,X0))
| theorem(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_8403,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,not(X1)))
| theorem(implies(X1,not(X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8369,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_8404,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,or(X1,X2)))
| theorem(or(X1,implies(X0,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8374,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_8406,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| theorem(implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8380,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_8476,plain,
theorem(or(X0,implies(X1,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_8404]) ).
cnf(c_8493,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ theorem(implies(X2,X0))
| theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8406,c_57]) ).
cnf(c_8560,plain,
theorem(implies(X0,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8476,c_8394]) ).
cnf(c_8582,plain,
theorem(implies(X0,not(not(X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8560,c_8403]) ).
cnf(c_8646,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,not(X2))))
| theorem(implies(X0,implies(X2,not(X1)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8369,c_8493]) ).
cnf(c_9571,plain,
( ~ theorem(implies(X0,not(X1)))
| theorem(implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X1,not(X2)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8406,c_8646]) ).
cnf(c_60230,plain,
~ theorem(implies(q,not(not(q)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_9571,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_60267,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60230,c_8582]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL182-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:07:38 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.46 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 49.26/7.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 49.26/7.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 %---------------- iProver v3.8 (pre SMT-COMP 2023/CASC 2023) ----------------%
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ iProver source info
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 git: date: 2023-05-31 18:12:56 +0000
% 49.26/7.28 git: sha1: 8abddc1f627fd3ce0bcb8b4cbf113b3cc443d7b6
% 49.26/7.28 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 49.26/7.28 git: last_make_outside_of_git: false
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Parsing...successful
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Proving...
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Problem Properties
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 clauses 8
% 49.26/7.28 conjectures 1
% 49.26/7.28 EPR 0
% 49.26/7.28 Horn 8
% 49.26/7.28 unary 7
% 49.26/7.28 binary 0
% 49.26/7.28 lits 10
% 49.26/7.28 lits eq 1
% 49.26/7.28 fd_pure 0
% 49.26/7.28 fd_pseudo 0
% 49.26/7.28 fd_cond 0
% 49.26/7.28 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 49.26/7.28 AC symbols 0
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------
% 49.26/7.28 Current options:
% 49.26/7.28 ------
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 ------ Proving...
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 49.26/7.28
% 49.26/7.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------