TSTP Solution File: LCL174-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL174-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:20 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.15s 10.33s
% Output : Refutation 10.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL174-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 20:13:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Sun Jul 3 20:13:37 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21465.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 -------- PROOF --------
% 10.15/10.33 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 10.15/10.33 % SZS output start Refutation
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 4 [ 1 6 46540 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 5 [ 1 1 1982 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 6 [ 3 3 22281 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 7 [ 2 2 10213 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 8 [ 3 3 18974 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 9 [ 3 4 20847 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 9.96 sec ----> 95 [binary,94.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 4.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 10.15/10.33 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 10.15/10.33 % SZS output start Refutation
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 10.15/10.33 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 10.15/10.33 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 10.15/10.33 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(p),r)))).
% 10.15/10.33 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 10.15/10.33 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 10.15/10.33 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 10.15/10.33 9 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 10.15/10.33 10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 10.15/10.33 18 [hyper,10,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),A)).
% 10.15/10.33 43 [hyper,9,3,18] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 10.15/10.33 94 [hyper,43,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(not(or(not(B),C)),or(A,C)))).
% 10.15/10.33 95 [binary,94.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 % SZS output end Refutation
% 10.15/10.33 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 ============ end of search ============
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 true clauses given 3 (15.0%)
% 10.15/10.33 false clauses given 17
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 FALSE TRUE
% 10.15/10.33 7 0 4
% 10.15/10.33 9 0 17
% 10.15/10.33 11 0 12
% 10.15/10.33 12 0 1
% 10.15/10.33 13 0 10
% 10.15/10.33 14 0 2
% 10.15/10.33 15 1 4
% 10.15/10.33 16 0 1
% 10.15/10.33 17 3 2
% 10.15/10.33 19 1 0
% 10.15/10.33 21 0 1
% 10.15/10.33 22 0 1
% 10.15/10.33 27 1 0
% 10.15/10.33 tot: 6 55 (90.2% true)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Model 9 [ 3 4 20847 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 10.15/10.33
% 10.15/10.33 Process 21465 finished Sun Jul 3 20:13:47 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------