TSTP Solution File: LCL174-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LCL174-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.56s 1.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   22 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  11   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   4   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (;  24   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ theorem > axiom > or > #nlpp > not > r > q > p

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(r,type,
    r: $i ).

tff(theorem,type,
    theorem: $i > $o ).

tff(or,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(not,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(q,type,
    q: $i ).

tff(axiom,type,
    axiom: $i > $o ).

tff(p,type,
    p: $i ).

tff(f_61,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_66,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] : axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_74,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( theorem(X)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y),X))
      | ~ theorem(Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_86,axiom,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(p),r)))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [A_9,B_10,C_11] : axiom(or(not(or(not(A_9),B_10)),or(not(or(C_11,A_9)),or(C_11,B_10)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_61]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [X_12] :
      ( ~ axiom(X_12)
      | theorem(X_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_66]) ).

tff(c_56,plain,
    ! [A_32,B_33,C_34] : axiom(or(not(or(A_32,or(B_33,C_34))),or(B_33,or(A_32,C_34)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [Y_14,X_13] :
      ( ~ theorem(Y_14)
      | ~ axiom(or(not(Y_14),X_13))
      | theorem(X_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_74]) ).

tff(c_79,plain,
    ! [A_39,B_40,C_41] :
      ( ~ theorem(or(A_39,or(B_40,C_41)))
      | theorem(or(B_40,or(A_39,C_41))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_14]) ).

tff(c_505,plain,
    ! [B_86,A_87,C_88] :
      ( theorem(or(B_86,or(A_87,C_88)))
      | ~ axiom(or(A_87,or(B_86,C_88))) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_79]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(p),r)))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_86]) ).

tff(c_514,plain,
    ~ axiom(or(not(or(not(q),r)),or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(p),r)))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_505,c_18]) ).

tff(c_538,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_514]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : LCL174-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 13:51:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.56/1.96  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.56/1.96  
% 3.56/1.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.56/1.99  
% 3.56/1.99  Inference rules
% 3.56/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.99  #Ref     : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Sup     : 124
% 3.56/1.99  #Fact    : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Define  : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Split   : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Chain   : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Close   : 0
% 3.56/1.99  
% 3.56/1.99  Ordering : KBO
% 3.56/1.99  
% 3.56/1.99  Simplification rules
% 3.56/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.56/1.99  #Subsume      : 39
% 3.56/1.99  #Demod        : 1
% 3.56/1.99  #Tautology    : 3
% 3.56/1.99  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.56/1.99  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.56/1.99  
% 3.56/1.99  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.56/1.99  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.56/1.99  
% 3.56/1.99  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.56/1.99  ----------------------
% 3.56/2.00  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 3.56/2.00  Parsing              : 0.23
% 3.56/2.00  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 3.56/2.00  Main loop            : 0.43
% 3.56/2.00  Inferencing          : 0.19
% 3.56/2.00  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.56/2.00  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.56/2.00  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.56/2.00  Subsumption          : 0.11
% 3.56/2.00  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 3.56/2.00  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.56/2.00  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.56/2.00  Total                : 0.91
% 3.56/2.00  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.56/2.00  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.56/2.00  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.56/2.00  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------