TSTP Solution File: LCL172-3 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL172-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:47:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.27s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   4   ~;   1   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   9   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f23,f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(or(X0,or(X1,X2))),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f4,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : implies(X3,X4) = or(not(X3),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : axiom(implies(or(X0,or(X1,X2)),or(X1,or(X0,X2)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_5) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ~ axiom(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(q),r))),or(not(q),or(not(p),r)))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X3] :
      ( theorem(X3)
      | ~ axiom(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(q),r))),or(not(q),or(not(p),r)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f9,f6,f6,f6,f6,f6]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,implies(q,r)),implies(q,implies(p,r)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : LCL172-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 01:49:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.50  % (18170)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (18191)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.20/0.51  % (18164)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.27/0.51  % (18175)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 1.27/0.51  % (18167)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 1.27/0.51  % (18168)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.27/0.51  % (18183)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)First to succeed.
% 1.27/0.52  TRYING [1]
% 1.27/0.52  TRYING [2]
% 1.27/0.52  % (18175)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.27/0.52  % (18188)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.27/0.52  
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Time elapsed: 0.105 s
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18170)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.27/0.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.27/0.52  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.27/0.52  
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Time elapsed: 0.111 s
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18183)------------------------------
% 1.27/0.52  % (18158)Success in time 0.168 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------