TSTP Solution File: LCL171-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : LCL171-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:48:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : LCL171-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 19:19:10 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.54 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.16/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.16/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.16/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.16/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 % File : LCL171-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.16/0.59 % Domain : Logic Calculi (Propositional)
% 0.16/0.59 % Problem : Principia Mathematica 2.03
% 0.16/0.59 % Version : [WR27] axioms : Reduced & Augmented.
% 0.16/0.59 % English :
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 % Refs : [WR27] Whitehead & Russell (1927), Principia Mathematica
% 0.16/0.59 % : [NSS63] Newell et al. (1963), Empirical Explorations with the
% 0.16/0.59 % : [ORo89] O'Rourke (1989), LT Revisited: Explanation-Based Learn
% 0.16/0.59 % : [SE94] Segre & Elkan (1994), A High-Performance Explanation-B
% 0.16/0.59 % Source : [SE94]
% 0.16/0.59 % Names : Problem 2.03 [WR27]
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.08 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.16/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% 0.16/0.59 % Number of literals : 14 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% 0.16/0.59 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% 0.16/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% 0.16/0.59 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.16/0.59 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.16/0.59 % Number of variables : 17 ( 1 sgn)
% 0.16/0.59 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 % Comments : Reduced to use only or and not, and includes a redundant rule
% 0.16/0.59 % of transitivity of implication, and a reduced rule of
% 0.16/0.59 % detachment.
% 0.16/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 %----Include axioms of propositional logic
% 0.16/0.59 include('Axioms/LCL003-0.ax').
% 0.16/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 0.16/0.59 ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),not(q))),or(not(q),not(p)))) ).
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.16/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.16/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.16/0.59 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.16/0.59 %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 0.16/0.59 %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.16/0.59 %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 0.16/0.59 %SharedTerms:9
% 0.16/0.59 %goalClause: 6
% 0.16/0.59 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.16/0.59 [6]~P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(a3),f1(a4))),f2(f1(a4),f1(a3))))
% 0.16/0.59 [2]P1(f2(f1(f2(x21,x21)),x21))
% 0.16/0.59 [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),f2(x12,x11)))
% 0.16/0.59 [3]P1(f2(f1(f2(x31,x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 0.16/0.59 [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,f2(x42,x43))),f2(x42,f2(x41,x43))))
% 0.16/0.59 [5]P1(f2(f1(f2(f1(x51),x52)),f2(f1(f2(x53,x51)),f2(x53,x52))))
% 0.16/0.59 [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)
% 0.16/0.59 [8]P2(x81)+~P2(x82)+~P1(f2(f1(x82),x81))
% 0.16/0.59 [9]~P2(f2(f1(x93),x92))+P2(f2(f1(x91),x92))+~P1(f2(f1(x91),x93))
% 0.16/0.59 %EqnAxiom
% 0.16/0.59
% 0.16/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.60 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.16/0.60 ($false),
% 0.16/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3,7]),
% 0.16/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.16/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.16/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------