TSTP Solution File: LCL170-1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : LCL170-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:39:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 3 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f13,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : axiom(or(not(X0),or(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_1_3) ).
fof(f12,plain,
~ axiom(or(not(q),or(not(p),q))),
inference(resolution,[],[f9,f6]) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X3] :
( ~ axiom(X3)
| theorem(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_1) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
~ theorem(or(not(q),or(not(p),q))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LCL170-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 01:36:42 EDT 2022
% 0.17/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 % (16083)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.18/0.48 % (16101)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.18/0.48 % (16092)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.49 TRYING [1]
% 0.18/0.49 TRYING [2]
% 0.18/0.49 % (16095)lrs+1003_1:1024_add=large:afr=on:cond=fast:fsr=off:gs=on:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:i=28:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/28Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (16079)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (16079)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Time elapsed: 0.049 s
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 % (16101)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 % (16073)Success in time 0.154 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------