TSTP Solution File: LCL170-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : LCL170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:11:47 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(q),or(not(p),q))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gdFaxbfc6k/E---3.1_22833.p',prove_this) ).
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gdFaxbfc6k/E---3.1_22833.p',rule_1) ).
cnf(axiom_1_3,axiom,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gdFaxbfc6k/E---3.1_22833.p',axiom_1_3) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ theorem(or(not(q),or(not(p),q))),
prove_this ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( theorem(X1)
| ~ axiom(X1) ),
rule_1 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
axiom(or(not(X1),or(X2,X1))),
axiom_1_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : LCL170-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.16/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 12:21:46 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gdFaxbfc6k/E---3.1_22833.p
% 0.22/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 22956 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.50 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 22969 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Result found by G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.22/0.50 # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.22/0.50 # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.22/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.22/0.50 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.22/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.22/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Generated clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Paramodulations : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.22/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.22/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.22/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 9
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.22/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.22/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.22/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.22/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 276
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1632 pages
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.22/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.22/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------