TSTP Solution File: LCL169-3 by Faust---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Faust---1.0
% Problem : LCL169-3 : TPTP v3.4.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : faust %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 1003MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.17-1.2142_FC4
% CPULimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed May 6 13:44:27 EDT 2009
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.1s
% Output : Refutation 0.1s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 12 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 4 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Faust---1.0 format not known, defaulting to TPTP
fof(rule_1,plain,
! [A] :
( theorem(A)
| ~ axiom(A) ),
file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(144266352,plain,
( theorem(A)
| ~ axiom(A) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[rule_1]),
[] ).
fof(axiom_1_2,plain,
! [A] : axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)),
file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(144235360,plain,
axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_2]),
[] ).
cnf(152077960,plain,
theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[144266352,144235360]),
[] ).
fof(implies_definition,plain,
! [A,B] : $equal(or(not(A),B),implies(A,B)),
file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(144259896,plain,
$equal(or(not(A),B),implies(A,B)),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[implies_definition]),
[] ).
cnf(152431320,plain,
theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)),
inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152077960,144259896,theory(equality)]),
[] ).
cnf(152499400,plain,
theorem(or(not(implies(A,not(A))),not(A))),
inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152431320,144259896,theory(equality)]),
[] ).
fof(prove_this,plain,
~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(144294024,plain,
~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_this]),
[] ).
cnf(contradiction,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152499400,144294024,144259896,theory(equality)]),
[] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Proof found in: 1 seconds
% START OF PROOF SEQUENCE
% fof(rule_1,plain,(theorem(A)|~axiom(A)),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(144266352,plain,(theorem(A)|~axiom(A)),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[rule_1]),[]).
%
% fof(axiom_1_2,plain,(axiom(implies(or(A,A),A))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(144235360,plain,(axiom(implies(or(A,A),A))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[axiom_1_2]),[]).
%
% cnf(152077960,plain,(theorem(implies(or(A,A),A))),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[144266352,144235360]),[]).
%
% fof(implies_definition,plain,($equal(or(not(A),B),implies(A,B))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(144259896,plain,($equal(or(not(A),B),implies(A,B))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[implies_definition]),[]).
%
% cnf(152431320,plain,(theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A))),inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152077960,144259896,theory(equality)]),[]).
%
% cnf(152499400,plain,(theorem(or(not(implies(A,not(A))),not(A)))),inference(paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152431320,144259896,theory(equality)]),[]).
%
% fof(prove_this,plain,(~theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p)))),file('/home/graph/tptp/TSTP/PreparedTPTP/tptp---none/LCL/LCL169-3.tptp',unknown),[]).
%
% cnf(144294024,plain,(~theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p)))),inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[prove_this]),[]).
%
% cnf(contradiction,plain,$false,inference(forward_subsumption_resolution__paramodulation,[status(thm)],[152499400,144294024,144259896,theory(equality)]),[]).
%
% END OF PROOF SEQUENCE
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------