TSTP Solution File: LCL169-3 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:11:47 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   2 equ;   5 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TeZDXqIRFX/E---3.1_6132.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TeZDXqIRFX/E---3.1_6132.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TeZDXqIRFX/E---3.1_6132.p',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TeZDXqIRFX/E---3.1_6132.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    prove_this ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),not(p))),not(p))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    rule_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,X1)),X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 12:41:45 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TeZDXqIRFX/E---3.1_6132.p
% 0.21/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 6211 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting C12_02_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 6215 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Result found by G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.51  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.51  # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 0.21/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 14
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 0.21/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.21/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.21/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3
% 0.21/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.21/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.21/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 287
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.51  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.51  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1680 pages
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------