TSTP Solution File: LCL169-3 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 07:51:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 07:17:27 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.71/1.09  [
% 0.71/1.09     [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ axiom( implies( X, or( Y, X ) ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ axiom( implies( or( X, Y ), or( Y, X ) ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ axiom( implies( or( X, or( Y, Z ) ), or( Y, or( X, Z ) ) ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ axiom( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( or( Z, X ), or( Z, Y ) ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( implies( X, Y ), or( not( X ), Y ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ theorem( X ), ~( theorem( implies( Y, X ) ) ), ~( theorem( Y ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09    ,
% 0.71/1.09     [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09  ] .
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  percentage equality = 0.083333, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.71/1.09  This is a problem with some equality
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.71/1.09  useparamod =        1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqfact =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.71/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.71/1.09  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.71/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.71/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  termordering =      kbo
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litapriori =        0
% 0.71/1.09  termapriori =       1
% 0.71/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.71/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.71/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.71/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litselect =         negord
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.71/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.71/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.71/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.71/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.71/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.71/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.71/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.71/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.71/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  prologoutput =     1
% 0.71/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.71/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:23, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  or  [40, 2]      (w:1, o:48, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  implies  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:49, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  axiom  [42, 1]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  not  [47, 1]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  theorem  [48, 1]      (w:1, o:22, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  p  [49, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 0, [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 5, [ =( or( not( X ), Y ), implies( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 6, [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 8, [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09     )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 10, [ theorem( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 131, [ theorem( implies( implies( X, not( X ) ), not( X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 165, [] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  initialclauses(
% 0.71/1.09  [ clause( 167, [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 168, [ axiom( implies( X, or( Y, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 169, [ axiom( implies( or( X, Y ), or( Y, X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 170, [ axiom( implies( or( X, or( Y, Z ) ), or( Y, or( X, Z ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 171, [ axiom( implies( implies( X, Y ), implies( or( Z, X ), or( 
% 0.71/1.09    Z, Y ) ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 172, [ =( implies( X, Y ), or( not( X ), Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 173, [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 174, [ theorem( X ), ~( theorem( implies( Y, X ) ) ), ~( theorem( 
% 0.71/1.09    Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 175, [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  ] ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 0, [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 167, [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  eqswap(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 176, [ =( or( not( X ), Y ), implies( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 172, [ =( implies( X, Y ), or( not( X ), Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] )).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 5, [ =( or( not( X ), Y ), implies( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 176, [ =( or( not( X ), Y ), implies( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0
% 0.71/1.09     )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 6, [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 173, [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 ), ==>( 1, 
% 0.71/1.09    1 )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 8, [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09     )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 175, [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 179, [ theorem( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 6, [ theorem( X ), ~( axiom( X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 1, clause( 0, [ axiom( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, implies( or( X, X ), X ) )] ), 
% 0.71/1.09    substitution( 1, [ :=( X, X )] )).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 10, [ theorem( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 179, [ theorem( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  paramod(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 181, [ theorem( implies( implies( X, not( X ) ), not( X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 5, [ =( or( not( X ), Y ), implies( X, Y ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, clause( 10, [ theorem( implies( or( X, X ), X ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, 2, substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, not( X ) )] ), substitution( 
% 0.71/1.09    1, [ :=( X, not( X ) )] )).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 131, [ theorem( implies( implies( X, not( X ) ), not( X ) ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 181, [ theorem( implies( implies( X, not( X ) ), not( X ) ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09     )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>( 0, 0 )] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resolution(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 182, [] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 8, [ ~( theorem( implies( implies( p, not( p ) ), not( p ) ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, clause( 131, [ theorem( implies( implies( X, not( X ) ), not( X ) ) )
% 0.71/1.09     ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , 0, substitution( 0, [] ), substitution( 1, [ :=( X, p )] )).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 165, [] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 182, [] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [] ), permutation( 0, [] ) ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  end.
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Memory use:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  space for terms:        1973
% 0.71/1.09  space for clauses:      9406
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  clauses generated:      236
% 0.71/1.10  clauses kept:           166
% 0.71/1.10  clauses selected:       25
% 0.71/1.10  clauses deleted:        1
% 0.71/1.10  clauses inuse deleted:  0
% 0.71/1.10  
% 0.71/1.10  subsentry:          637
% 0.71/1.10  literals s-matched: 555
% 0.71/1.10  literals matched:   550
% 0.71/1.10  full subsumption:   81
% 0.71/1.10  
% 0.71/1.10  checksum:           -1100669911
% 0.71/1.10  
% 0.71/1.10  
% 0.71/1.10  Bliksem ended
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------