TSTP Solution File: LCL163-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL163-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:45:15 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  38 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  37 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_7,axiom,
    xor(X1,xor(truth,X2)) = xor(xor(X1,truth),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-0.ax',axiom_7) ).

cnf(axiom_1,axiom,
    not(X1) = xor(X1,truth),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-0.ax',axiom_1) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = xor(truth,and_star(X1,xor(truth,X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',implies_definition) ).

cnf(axiom_2,axiom,
    xor(X1,falsehood) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-0.ax',axiom_2) ).

cnf(axiom_4,axiom,
    and_star(X1,truth) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-0.ax',axiom_4) ).

cnf(false_definition,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',false_definition) ).

cnf(xor_commutativity,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = xor(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',xor_commutativity) ).

cnf(and_star_commutativity,axiom,
    and_star(X1,X2) = and_star(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',and_star_commutativity) ).

cnf(axiom_8,axiom,
    and_star(xor(and_star(xor(truth,X1),X2),truth),X2) = and_star(xor(and_star(xor(truth,X2),X1),truth),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-0.ax',axiom_8) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_axiom,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(x,y),y) != implies(implies(y,x),x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    xor(X1,xor(truth,X2)) = xor(xor(X1,truth),X2),
    axiom_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    not(X1) = xor(X1,truth),
    axiom_1 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = xor(truth,and_star(X1,xor(truth,X2))),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    xor(X1,falsehood) = X1,
    axiom_2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    and_star(X1,truth) = X1,
    axiom_4 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    xor(X1,xor(truth,X2)) = xor(not(X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    false_definition ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    xor(truth,X1) = implies(X1,falsehood),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = xor(X2,X1),
    xor_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_16]),c_0_13]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    not(X1) = implies(X1,falsehood),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,falsehood),falsehood) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(and_star(X1,implies(X2,falsehood)),falsehood) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    and_star(X1,implies(X2,falsehood)) = implies(implies(X1,X2),falsehood),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    and_star(X1,X2) = and_star(X2,X1),
    and_star_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    and_star(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,falsehood)),falsehood),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    and_star(xor(and_star(xor(truth,X1),X2),truth),X2) = and_star(xor(and_star(xor(truth,X2),X1),truth),X1),
    axiom_8 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,falsehood)),falsehood) = implies(implies(X2,implies(X1,falsehood)),falsehood),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    and_star(X1,not(and_star(xor(truth,X2),X1))) = and_star(X2,not(and_star(xor(truth,X1),X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_11]),c_0_24]),c_0_11]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,falsehood)) = implies(X2,implies(X1,falsehood)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    and_star(X1,implies(and_star(implies(X2,falsehood),X1),falsehood)) = and_star(X2,implies(and_star(implies(X1,falsehood),X2),falsehood)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]),c_0_20]),c_0_17]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,falsehood),implies(X2,falsehood)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),falsehood)),falsehood) = implies(implies(X2,implies(implies(X2,X1),falsehood)),falsehood),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_23]),c_0_23]),c_0_25]),c_0_31]),c_0_25]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(x,y),y) != implies(implies(y,x),x),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_wajsberg_axiom]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),falsehood)) = implies(X2,implies(implies(X2,X1),falsehood)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_32]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    implies(implies(x,y),y) != implies(implies(y,x),x),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_31]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : LCL163-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 03:15:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # sh5l with pid 17335 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 17342 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 14
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 84
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 14
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 56
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 403
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 167
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 403
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 758
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 646
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 57
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 57
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 36
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 101
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 80
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5198
% 0.20/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------