TSTP Solution File: LCL161-1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : LCL161-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:07:14 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 17.76s 2.63s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : LCL161-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 13:31:59 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 17.76/2.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 17.76/2.63 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 x != xor(truth,and_star(truth,xor(truth,x)))).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c1, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 x != xor(truth,and_star(truth,xor(truth,x))),
% 17.76/2.63 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 and_star(X0,X1) = and_star(X1,X0)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 and_star(truth,xor(truth,x)) = and_star(X1,X0)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c3, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c4, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c5, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X2 != and_star(X0,X1) | x != xor(truth,X2),
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c6, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 and_star(X3,truth) = X3).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 and_star(X0,X1) = and_star(X3,truth)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c7, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 x != xor(truth,X2),
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c8, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c9, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X4 != X3 | X2 != X4,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a1])], [c5, c6])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X4 = X3).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c10, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X2 != X4,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c9])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X2 = X4).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c11, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a3])], [c10])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c12, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X5,xor(truth,X6)) = xor(xor(X5,truth),X6)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(truth,X2) = xor(X5,xor(truth,X6))).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c13, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c14, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c15, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X7 != xor(xor(X5,truth),X6) | x != X7,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a4])], [c7, c12])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c16, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 falsehood = xor(truth,truth)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X5,truth) = xor(truth,truth)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c17, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 x != X7,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c18, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c19, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X8 != falsehood | X7 != xor(X8,X6),
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a5])], [c15, c16])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X8 = falsehood).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c20, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X7 != xor(X8,X6),
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a6])], [c19])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c21, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X9,X10) = xor(X10,X9)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X8,X6) = xor(X9,X10)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c22, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c20, c21])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c23, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c20, c21])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c24, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X11 != xor(X10,X9) | X7 != X11,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a7])], [c20, c21])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c25, axiom,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X12,falsehood) = X12).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a8, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 xor(X10,X9) = xor(X12,falsehood)).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c26, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X7 != X11,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c24, c25])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c27, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c24, c25])).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c28, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X13 != X12 | X11 != X13,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a8])], [c24, c25])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a9, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X13 = X12).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c29, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 X11 != X13,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a9])], [c28])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a10, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X11 = X13).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c30, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a10])], [c29])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a11, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 X7 = X11).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c31, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a11])], [c26])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(a12, assumption,
% 17.76/2.63 x = X7).
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c32, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c17])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 cnf(c33, plain,
% 17.76/2.63 $false,
% 17.76/2.63 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X0, xor(truth,x)),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X1, truth),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X2, xor(truth,x)),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X3, xor(truth,x)),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X4, xor(truth,x)),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X5, truth),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X6, x),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X7, x),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X8, falsehood),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X9, falsehood),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X10, x),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X11, x),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X12, x),
% 17.76/2.63 bind(X13, x)
% 17.76/2.63 ],
% 17.76/2.63 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12])).
% 17.76/2.63
% 17.76/2.63 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------