TSTP Solution File: LCL159-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : LCL159-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:11:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   17
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  50 unt;   0 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (  49 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(false_definition,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',false_definition) ).

cnf(or_commutativity,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',or_commutativity) ).

cnf(or_definition,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',or_definition) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(and_definition,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',and_definition) ).

cnf(xor_definition,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = or(and(X1,not(X2)),and(not(X1),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',xor_definition) ).

cnf(prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom,negated_conjecture,
    xor(x,xor(truth,y)) != xor(xor(x,truth),y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(xor_commutativity,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = xor(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p',xor_commutativity) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    not(truth) = falsehood,
    false_definition ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    or_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    or_definition ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),falsehood),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(not(falsehood),X1),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(not(falsehood),not(falsehood)) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),not(X2)) = implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    not(falsehood) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_21]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    implies(not(X1),truth) = implies(falsehood,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    implies(implies(falsehood,X1),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_17]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    and(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_definition ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    implies(falsehood,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = or(and(X1,not(X2)),and(not(X1),X2)),
    xor_definition ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    and(X1,X2) = not(implies(not(not(X1)),not(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    implies(not(X1),falsehood) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    implies(X1,falsehood) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_30]),c_0_12]),c_0_23]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    xor(X1,X2) = implies(not(not(implies(not(not(X1)),not(not(X2))))),not(implies(not(not(not(X1))),not(X2)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_15]),c_0_32]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(not(X1),not(X2)))) = xor(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_36]),c_0_36]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),not(implies(X2,X1))) = xor(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_17]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(X2)) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    xor(not(X1),not(X2)) = xor(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]),c_0_39]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    xor(x,xor(truth,y)) != xor(xor(x,truth),y),
    prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_42,axiom,
    xor(X1,X2) = xor(X2,X1),
    xor_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    xor(not(X1),X2) = xor(not(X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    xor(y,xor(truth,x)) != xor(x,xor(truth,y)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    xor(truth,X1) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_13]),c_0_12]),c_0_30]),c_0_13]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    xor(not(X1),X2) = xor(X1,not(X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    xor(y,not(x)) != xor(x,not(y)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    xor(X1,not(X2)) = xor(X2,not(X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_46]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem    : LCL159-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.16  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 11:47:38 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.38/0.54  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.38/0.54  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.krHaDzUcCA/E---3.1_32167.p
% 0.38/0.62  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.38/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 32246 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.38/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.38/0.62  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 32253 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.38/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.38/0.62  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.62  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 811s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.38/0.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.38/0.62  
% 0.38/0.62  # Proof found!
% 0.38/0.62  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.62  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.38/0.62  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.38/0.62  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.38/0.62  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.38/0.62  # Processed clauses                    : 182
% 0.38/0.62  # ...of these trivial                  : 80
% 0.38/0.62  # ...subsumed                          : 10
% 0.38/0.62  # ...remaining for further processing  : 92
% 0.38/0.62  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Backward-rewritten                   : 26
% 0.38/0.62  # Generated clauses                    : 3171
% 0.38/0.62  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1685
% 0.38/0.62  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Paramodulations                      : 3171
% 0.38/0.62  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Total rewrite steps                  : 5166
% 0.38/0.62  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62  # Current number of processed clauses  : 55
% 0.38/0.62  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 48
% 0.38/0.62  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.38/0.62  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.38/0.62  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1473
% 0.38/0.62  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1473
% 0.38/0.62  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Current number of archived clauses   : 40
% 0.38/0.62  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.38/0.62  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 184
% 0.38/0.62  # BW rewrite match successes           : 61
% 0.38/0.62  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.38/0.62  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 33233
% 0.38/0.62  
% 0.38/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.62  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.38/0.62  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.38/0.62  # Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.38/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1628 pages
% 0.38/0.62  
% 0.38/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.62  # User time                : 0.308 s
% 0.38/0.62  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.38/0.62  # Total time               : 0.321 s
% 0.38/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.38/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.38/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------