TSTP Solution File: LCL156-1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : LCL156-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:52:32 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  34 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    5 (   5   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   6   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   4 sgn;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    truth: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    implies: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    not: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    or: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    and: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    xor: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    and_star: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    falsehood: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    x: $i ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(or_commutativity,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',or_commutativity) ).

cnf(or_definition,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-2.ax',or_definition) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL001-0.ax',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(and_star_definition,axiom,
    and_star(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL002-1.ax',and_star_definition) ).

cnf(prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom,negated_conjecture,
    and_star(x,truth) != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = or(X2,X1),
    or_commutativity ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    or(X1,X2) = implies(not(X1),X2),
    or_definition ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(not(X1),X2) = implies(not(X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    implies(implies(not(not(truth)),X1),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(not(truth))),not(not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    not(not(truth)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_16]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    and_star(X1,X2) = not(or(not(X1),not(X2))),
    and_star_definition ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    and_star(x,truth) != x,
    prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    and_star(X1,X2) = not(implies(not(not(X1)),not(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    not(implies(not(not(x)),not(truth))) != x,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(X2)),not(X2)) = implies(implies(not(X1),X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    not(implies(not(not(truth)),not(x))) != x,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_9]),c_0_18]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    not(not(x)) != x,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_18]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL156-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 22:09:40 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.59  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.009000 s
% 0.20/0.59  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.59  % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------