TSTP Solution File: LCL155-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : LCL155-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:17:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output : Proof 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL155-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 03:23:24 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.42 Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 1 (false_definition): not(truth) = falsehood.
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 2 (and_star_commutativity): and_star(X, Y) = and_star(Y, X).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 3 (or_commutativity): or(X, Y) = or(Y, X).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 4 (wajsberg_1): implies(truth, X) = X.
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 5 (or_definition): or(X, Y) = implies(not(X), Y).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 6 (and_star_definition): and_star(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y))).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 7 (and_definition): and(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y))).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 8 (xor_definition): xor(X, Y) = or(and(X, not(Y)), and(not(X), Y)).
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 9 (wajsberg_4): implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X)) = truth.
% 0.13/0.42 Axiom 10 (wajsberg_2): implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = truth.
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 Lemma 11: and(X, Y) = and_star(X, Y).
% 0.13/0.42 Proof:
% 0.13/0.42 and(X, Y)
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 7 (and_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 not(or(not(X), not(Y)))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 6 (and_star_definition) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 and_star(X, Y)
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 Lemma 12: or(X, not(X)) = truth.
% 0.13/0.42 Proof:
% 0.13/0.42 or(X, not(X))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 5 (or_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(not(X), not(X))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(truth, not(X)), not(X))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(truth, implies(implies(truth, not(X)), not(X)))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(truth, implies(implies(truth, not(X)), implies(truth, not(X))))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(truth, truth), implies(implies(truth, not(X)), implies(truth, not(X))))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 10 (wajsberg_2) }
% 0.13/0.42 truth
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 Lemma 13: and_star(X, not(X)) = falsehood.
% 0.13/0.42 Proof:
% 0.13/0.42 and_star(X, not(X))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 6 (and_star_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 not(or(not(X), not(not(X))))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 12 }
% 0.13/0.42 not(truth)
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (false_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 falsehood
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 Goal 1 (prove_alternative_wajsberg_axiom): xor(x, x) = falsehood.
% 0.13/0.42 Proof:
% 0.13/0.42 xor(x, x)
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 8 (xor_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 or(and(x, not(x)), and(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.13/0.42 or(and_star(x, not(x)), and(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 11 }
% 0.13/0.42 or(and_star(x, not(x)), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.13/0.42 or(falsehood, and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 5 (or_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(not(falsehood), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(truth, not(falsehood)), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(or(falsehood, not(falsehood)), not(falsehood)), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 3 (or_commutativity) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(or(not(falsehood), falsehood), not(falsehood)), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(or(not(falsehood), falsehood), implies(truth, not(falsehood))), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 1 (false_definition) R->L }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(or(not(falsehood), not(truth)), implies(truth, not(falsehood))), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 5 (or_definition) }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(implies(implies(not(not(falsehood)), not(truth)), implies(truth, not(falsehood))), and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 9 (wajsberg_4) }
% 0.13/0.42 implies(truth, and_star(not(x), x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 4 (wajsberg_1) }
% 0.13/0.42 and_star(not(x), x)
% 0.13/0.42 = { by axiom 2 (and_star_commutativity) }
% 0.13/0.42 and_star(x, not(x))
% 0.13/0.42 = { by lemma 13 }
% 0.13/0.42 falsehood
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------