TSTP Solution File: LCL154-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : LCL154-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:58:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 115.17s 115.19s
% Output   : Proof 115.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : LCL154-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.15/0.37  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 12:07:16 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 115.17/115.19  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 115.17/115.19  % SZS output start Proof
% 115.17/115.19  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(truth, X) = X
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), Y) = implies(implies(Y, X), X)
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X)) = truth
% 115.17/115.19  	or(X, Y) = implies(not(X), Y)
% 115.17/115.19  	or(or(X, Y), Z) = or(X, or(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	or(X, Y) = or(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	and(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and(and(X, Y), Z) = and(X, and(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	and(X, Y) = and(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(X, Y) = or(and(X, not(Y)), and(not(X), Y))
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(X, Y) = xor(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(and_star(X, Y), Z) = and_star(X, and_star(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(X, Y) = and_star(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	not(truth) = falsehood
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(x, falsehood) = x ==> \bottom
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  This holds because
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  E:
% 115.17/115.19  	and(X, Y) = and(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	and(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and(and(X, Y), Z) = and(X, and(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(X, Y) = and_star(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(X, Y) = not(or(not(X), not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(and_star(X, Y), Z) = and_star(X, and_star(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	f1(x) = false__
% 115.17/115.19  	f1(xor(x, falsehood)) = true__
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), Y) = implies(implies(Y, X), X)
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) = truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X)) = truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(truth, X) = X
% 115.17/115.19  	not(truth) = falsehood
% 115.17/115.19  	or(X, Y) = implies(not(X), Y)
% 115.17/115.19  	or(X, Y) = or(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  	or(or(X, Y), Z) = or(X, or(Y, Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(X, Y) = or(and(X, not(Y)), and(not(X), Y))
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(X, Y) = xor(Y, X)
% 115.17/115.19  G:
% 115.17/115.19  	true__ = false__
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  This holds because
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(X0, Y1) = implies(not(Y1), not(X0))
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(X1, not(X0)) = implies(X0, not(X1))
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), Y) = implies(implies(Y, X), X)
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), not(implies(not(X), not(Y)))) = implies(implies(Y, X), not(implies(not(Y), not(X))))
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(not(X), Y) = implies(not(Y), X)
% 115.17/115.19  	not(implies(X, not(Y))) = not(implies(Y, not(X)))
% 115.17/115.19  	not(implies(Y0, X0)) = not(implies(not(X0), not(Y0)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and(X, Y) -> not(implies(X, not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and(and(X, Y), Z) -> not(implies(X, implies(Y, not(Z))))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(X, Y) -> not(implies(X, not(Y)))
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star(and_star(X, Y), Z) -> not(implies(X, implies(Y, not(Z))))
% 115.17/115.19  	f1(not(not(x))) -> true__
% 115.17/115.19  	f1(x) -> false__
% 115.17/115.19  	falsehood -> not(truth)
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(X0, not(truth)) -> not(X0)
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(Y0, implies(not(Y0), X0)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(Y0, truth) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(Y1, Y1) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(Y1, implies(Y0, Y1)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(Y1, implies(implies(Y1, Y2), Y2)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X, Y), implies(implies(Y, Z), implies(X, Z))) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X0, Y1), implies(implies(implies(Y1, X0), X0), Y1)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X0, not(X1)), implies(not(implies(X1, not(X0))), Y1)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(X0, not(Y1)), implies(Y1, not(X0))) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(Y0, not(truth)), implies(Y0, Y2)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(not(X), not(Y)), implies(Y, X)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(implies(not(Y1), X0), Y1) -> implies(implies(Y1, not(X0)), not(X0))
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(not(X0), implies(X0, Y1)) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(not(truth), Y0) -> truth
% 115.17/115.19  	implies(truth, X) -> X
% 115.17/115.19  	not(not(Y0)) -> Y0
% 115.17/115.19  	or(X, Y) -> implies(not(X), Y)
% 115.17/115.19  	or(or(X, Y), Z) -> implies(not(X), implies(not(Y), Z))
% 115.17/115.19  	true__ -> false__
% 115.17/115.19  	xor(X, Y) -> implies(implies(X, Y), not(implies(not(X), not(Y))))
% 115.17/115.19  with the LPO induced by
% 115.17/115.19  	and_star > xor > and > or > implies > x > falsehood > not > truth > f1 > true__ > false__
% 115.17/115.19  
% 115.17/115.19  % SZS output end Proof
% 115.17/115.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------